2019
DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/tpyux
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Yellow Vests Movement - a case of long transient dynamics?

Abstract: Understanding the dynamics of protests and social unrest is important in order to ensure a stable, sustainable development of the society. Mathematical models of social dynamics have been increasingly recognised as a powerful research tool in achieving this goal. Here, motivated by the fact that the dynamics of the ongoing Yellow Vest Movement in France exhibit anomalously long duration (currently it is in 30th week), we explore whether this can be a result of a dynamical systems phenomenon known as long trans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e.g., see [37,38]. Estimate (17) obtained by linearizing the system (12) and (13) therefore coincides with the speed of the travelling front in a scalar reaction-diffusion equation with the generalized logistic growth [42,43]. However, the expression (17) appears to be in bad disagreement with numerical results predicting a value considerably less than was obtained in the simulations, e.g., two instead of 3.1 for the parameters of Figure 8.…”
Section: Two Component Modelmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…e.g., see [37,38]. Estimate (17) obtained by linearizing the system (12) and (13) therefore coincides with the speed of the travelling front in a scalar reaction-diffusion equation with the generalized logistic growth [42,43]. However, the expression (17) appears to be in bad disagreement with numerical results predicting a value considerably less than was obtained in the simulations, e.g., two instead of 3.1 for the parameters of Figure 8.…”
Section: Two Component Modelmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, the expression (17) appears to be in bad disagreement with numerical results predicting a value considerably less than was obtained in the simulations, e.g., two instead of 3.1 for the parameters of Figure 8. Even worse, it does not in any way predict the dependence of the speed on parameter values: for instance, for = 0.1 Expression (17) gives c ≈ 0.63, whilst the actual value is about 2.6. A more careful look readily reveals the reason for this disagreement: as a matter of fact, Expression (17) is hardly relevant at all as its validity is limited to the case where the growth function is convex [42,43], whilst in our case, it is not (see Figure 12).…”
Section: Two Component Modelmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations