2014
DOI: 10.1111/trf.12962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The yield of universal antibody to hepatitis B core antigen donor screening in theNetherlands, a hepatitis B virus low‐endemic country

Abstract: Anti-HBc testing has improved the safety of the Dutch blood supply but its exact yield remains difficult to determine, due to the complexity of confirming anti-HBc reactivity and OBI. In a low-endemic country, donor loss associated with anti-HBc screening is sustainable, but adds to the already considerable list of donor exclusions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though anti-HBc reactivity alone does not necessarily indicate a high likelihood of infection transmission, especially in the absence of other markers of HBV disease, and screening for anti-HBc is considered an added precaution for a safer blood product [20], this study recommends that blood banks screening for anti-HBc must either design or adopt previously published algorithms [20,21], which would enable these banks to re-qualify anti-HBc positive donors for blood donation, thus reducing donor loss whilst trying to ensure the safety of blood and blood products [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though anti-HBc reactivity alone does not necessarily indicate a high likelihood of infection transmission, especially in the absence of other markers of HBV disease, and screening for anti-HBc is considered an added precaution for a safer blood product [20], this study recommends that blood banks screening for anti-HBc must either design or adopt previously published algorithms [20,21], which would enable these banks to re-qualify anti-HBc positive donors for blood donation, thus reducing donor loss whilst trying to ensure the safety of blood and blood products [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally admitted that deferring anti-HBc reactive units would too severely affect blood supply and at a non-affordable cost in medium- and high-endemic areas where anti-HBc prevalence in blood donors ranges between 8 and >50% (i.e., Mediterranean area, East Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa). By contrast, the donor loss caused by universal anti-HBc screening was considered sustainable in some medium/low-endemic countries including Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Lebanon, and USA ( 60 , 61 ). To limit potential donor loss associated with a ~5% anti-HBc prevalence, Japan implemented a complex screening algorithm that includes anti-HBs testing of anti-HBc only donations ( 56 ).…”
Section: Anti-hbc Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some HBV lowprevalence countries, donor screening with anti-HBc is used to interdict donors at risk for OBI. 17,28,31 In higherprevalence settings, exclusion of donations containing anti-HBc would not be feasible. In these settings, the choice between IDT NAT and MP NAT for detection of OBI involves consideration of OBI prevalence, balancing of NAT sensitivity versus specificity, throughput, and cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%