1977
DOI: 10.1021/ja00463a012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The zero-point-average structure of bicyclo[3.1.0]hexane as determined by electron diffraction and microwave spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chair conformers of these bicyclic rings contain two pairs of eclipsing interactions between a pseudoaxial C–H bond in the five-membered ring (as shown in Fig. 3, A for 4a ) and either an N + –R bond or a C–H bond at one of the ring junctions (not shown), as documented previously [2729]. When C(4) is fluorinated, the so-called electrostatic gauche effect [30][31], i.e.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The chair conformers of these bicyclic rings contain two pairs of eclipsing interactions between a pseudoaxial C–H bond in the five-membered ring (as shown in Fig. 3, A for 4a ) and either an N + –R bond or a C–H bond at one of the ring junctions (not shown), as documented previously [2729]. When C(4) is fluorinated, the so-called electrostatic gauche effect [30][31], i.e.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This gave the bicycle [3.1.0] structure of ( 16 ) and ( 17 ) as a flattened boat conformer with an angle of pucker ca 20°. This is in complete agreement with the results of both theoretical and experimental investigations of related compounds …”
Section: Geometriessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, electron diffraction microwave spectroscopy [3] and ab-initio calculations [4][5][6][7][8][9] confirmed the restricted presence of only the pseudoboat conformation. Specifically for the N and S thymidine analogues (compounds 17 and 75 in Schemes 12.2 and 12.11), quantum mechanical potential energy surfaces obtained after constraining a chosen target dihedral in 10 increments, and allowing the remaining degrees of freedom [except for c (252 ) and g (51 )] to optimize to the default tolerance showed that the pseudoboat conformation is indeed more stable [10] (Figure 12.2).…”
Section: Pseudoboat Versus Pseudochair Conformationsmentioning
confidence: 97%