LETTER TO THE EDITOR around D +224 she was diagnosed with pulmonary GVHD and therefore received photopheresis (biweekly) and ruxolitinb (5 mg twice daily). Ruxolitinb was discontinued due to lack of response and intolerance. She then received eight infusions of mesenchymal stromal cells (2 × 10 6 MSCs/kg) again with no response. On D +266 post-BMT, she commenced treatment intravenous vedolizumab (6 mg/kg: 200 mg) and received three doses on weeks 0, 2, and 6. She tolerated the infusions and experienced no side effects. She had a partial response on day 7 (stage one GI, grade II aGVHD) and complete response (grade 0 aGVHD) on day nine from the first and second dose of vedolizumab, respectively. Fecal calprotectin decreased from 1285 𝜇g/g (0-50 𝜇g/g) pre-vedolizumab to 295 𝜇g/g post-vedolizumab. The patient suffered no infectious complications. She is now 34 months post-BMT with no GI symptoms, gaining weight with a performance score of 90% and 99% donor chimerism in whole blood, CD3, and CD33 fractions. Her pulmonary GVHD responded to ibrutinib (started 23 months post-BMT). The clinical improvement seen in our single patient demonstrates that vedolizumab may be effective in children with SRaGVHD.Given the unmet need for novel therapies to treat SRaGVHD in children, 10 prospective pediatric studies using vedolizumab seems to be a reasonable option to pursue.