1973
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1973.tb17262.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The β‐adrenoceptor blocking properties of the α‐methyl analogues of propranolol and practolol in the anaesthetized dog

Abstract: Summary1. The /8-adrenoceptor blocking properties of a-methyl propranolol and a-methyl practolol were determined in anaesthetized dogs according to their abilities to modify the isoprenaline-induced effects on diastolic pressure, heart rate, myocardial contractile force, femoral arterial blood flow and pulmonary airway resistance. 2. a-Methyl propranolol shifted the isoprenaline dose-response curves for the fall in diastolic pressure and the positive inotropic and chronotropic responses to the right in a paral… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it is not possible to control the distribution and disposition patterns of the administered drugs. Conclusions from the above publications are further complicated because some of the antagonists used had only low potency in the tissues concerned (Levy, 1973c;Wasserman & Levy, 1974) or because some results were inconsistent with competitive antagonism (Boissier et aL, 1971). With these potential drawbacks in mind, it is appropriate to consider the relevance of the present results to the sub-classification of 1-adrenoceptors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it is not possible to control the distribution and disposition patterns of the administered drugs. Conclusions from the above publications are further complicated because some of the antagonists used had only low potency in the tissues concerned (Levy, 1973c;Wasserman & Levy, 1974) or because some results were inconsistent with competitive antagonism (Boissier et aL, 1971). With these potential drawbacks in mind, it is appropriate to consider the relevance of the present results to the sub-classification of 1-adrenoceptors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a-Methylpropranolol was more potent in antagonizing vascular (hind limb perfusion pressure) than cardiac (heart rate) responses to isoprenaline in dogs, and on this basis it could be classified as a vascular-selective or Pz-adrenoceptor antagonist, along with H 35/25 and a-methyl DCI. At first sight, this appeared tosupport the conclusion of Levy (1973), that a-methylpropranolol was a selective 0-adrenoceptor antagonist. However, inspection of the pA2 values of 6.66 for vascular (diastolic blood pressure) and 6.59 for cardiac (heart rate) responses to isoprenaline quoted by Levy (1973) reveals no support for vascular cardiac selectivity.…”
Section: R E S U L T Smentioning
confidence: 95%
“…At first sight, this appeared tosupport the conclusion of Levy (1973), that a-methylpropranolol was a selective 0-adrenoceptor antagonist. However, inspection of the pA2 values of 6.66 for vascular (diastolic blood pressure) and 6.59 for cardiac (heart rate) responses to isoprenaline quoted by Levy (1973) reveals no support for vascular cardiac selectivity. More importantly in the present study, propranolol itself was more potent in antagonizing vascular than cardiac responses to isoprenaline.…”
Section: R E S U L T Smentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two of the antagonists examined were benzimidazole analogues of propranolol (Figure 1), the synthesis of which has been recently described (Fauland, Kampe, Thiel, Bartsch & Schaumann, 1976;Crooks, Wright, Callery & Moreton, 1979). Crooks and his co-workers suggested that one of these compounds, which they referred to as 4-BIP (+ )-1-(4-benzimidazoloxy)-3-isopropylamino-2-propanol (Figure 1), was a potent selective f2-adrenoceptor antagonist which they deduced from 0007-1188/80/040705-06 $01.00 (Levy, 1973;Todd, 1976;Fitzgerald & O'Donnell, 1978). In the present study an attempt has been made to quantify the selectivity of this antagonist in vitro.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%