2017
DOI: 10.1093/mts/mtx007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thematic and Non-Thematic Textures in Schubert’s Three-Key Expositions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…100-104 (2014, 131). Viewing this passage from a textural perspective, in contrast, Duane (2017) analyzes mm. 60-137 in their entirety as the subordinate theme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…100-104 (2014, 131). Viewing this passage from a textural perspective, in contrast, Duane (2017) analyzes mm. 60-137 in their entirety as the subordinate theme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent publications have dealt with its historical evolution (Hunt 2009) and Schenkerian voice‐leading considerations (Hunt 2014), and with three‐part structures and digressions in Schubert's three‐key expositions (Grant 2018). Other studies introduce the concept of ‘deflected cadences’ (Black 2015) and a computational model of texture (Duane 2017), 1 and an even more complex phenomenon, the four‐key exposition, has been identified (Rusch 2016). 2 Yet to be examined in detail, however, is one simple, yet fundamental, question: how and where do composers go from the second key to the third key? 3 Although the cited studies do address this indirectly, no clear typology for these internal modulations has been established.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, Duane claims that ‘the second key [in a three‐key exposition] is always understood as structurally subordinate to the first and third key [… and] no analyses have contradicted this idea’ (2017, p. 36), yet I made that very claim three years previously (in the same journal), noting that, for example, Schubert's ‘Death and the Maiden’ String Quartet's exposition is ‘the best case [example of] a middleground I–III–V arpeggiation, in which the second key is not structurally subordinate’ to the first and third keys (Hunt 2014, pp. 253–6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%