2014
DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n2p63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thematic Lessons from the Marikana Miners’ Strike in South Africa: A Corporate Governance Perspective

Abstract: The Marikana's miners' strike began on 10 August with the demand by approximately three thousand rock drillers to have salaries increased from R4 000,00 per month to R12 500,00 per month. These workers walked off the job after Lonmin management failed to meet with workers. A series of violence then followed leading to the massacre that occurred on 16 August when at least thirty six miners were killed and seventy eight wounded by members

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet the industry has faced increased criticisms from non-governmental organisations, activist groups and international governmental institutions regarding issues of corporate social irresponsibility (Lin-Hi and Müller 2013;Hilson 2008), including poor transparency, human rights abuses, child labour, money laundering, bribery and corruption, environmental degradation from mining, and funding terrorism from conflict minerals, as well as the industry's failure to demonstrate a substantial commitment to addressing these concerns and promoting ethical business practices (OECD 2013;RJC 2013a;Global Witness 2006Human Rights Watch 2009;Childs 2010;Goreux 2001). These criticisms present significant challenges to the organisation of global jewellery supply chains (Earthworks 2010(Earthworks , 2013, as well as corporate governance (Muskawa 2014). While corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become mainstream (Baden et al 2011), the jewellery industry is still lagging behind in their commitment to CSR (Charles 2010;Nair 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet the industry has faced increased criticisms from non-governmental organisations, activist groups and international governmental institutions regarding issues of corporate social irresponsibility (Lin-Hi and Müller 2013;Hilson 2008), including poor transparency, human rights abuses, child labour, money laundering, bribery and corruption, environmental degradation from mining, and funding terrorism from conflict minerals, as well as the industry's failure to demonstrate a substantial commitment to addressing these concerns and promoting ethical business practices (OECD 2013;RJC 2013a;Global Witness 2006Human Rights Watch 2009;Childs 2010;Goreux 2001). These criticisms present significant challenges to the organisation of global jewellery supply chains (Earthworks 2010(Earthworks , 2013, as well as corporate governance (Muskawa 2014). While corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become mainstream (Baden et al 2011), the jewellery industry is still lagging behind in their commitment to CSR (Charles 2010;Nair 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the contrary, Pegg (2006), a proponent of the 'resource curse', argues that mining activities are likely to exacerbate poverty. The argument is corroborated by the assertion that multi-national mining companies are not committed and CSR programmes are poorly designed (Conde & Le Billon, 2017;Osei-Kojo & Andrews, 2020;Muswaka, 2014). The thematic orientation of these findings prompted the study to examine knowledge management, mentoring and change management models in the context of the research problem.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussion Of The Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Non-profit organisations, activist groups, and international governmental institutions have drawn consumer attention to ethics in jewellery manufacturing via campaigns addressing corporate social irresponsibility (Hilson 2008(Hilson , 2015Moraes et al 2017), including lack of transparency, human rights abuses such as child labour, environmental degradation from mining, and the role of conflict diamonds in funding terrorism. These criticisms present fundamental challenges to the organisations of the global jewellery supply chain, as well as corporate governance (Muskawa 2014). Many scholars (Kapferer and Michaut-Denizeau 2013) note that most major mining companies and luxury groups have over the past twenty years embraced ethical and sustainability positions; Tiffany and De Beers have long cited social and environmental responsibility as intrinsic to their business models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars (Kapferer and Michaut-Denizeau 2013) note that most major mining companies and luxury groups have over the past twenty years embraced ethical and sustainability positions; Tiffany and De Beers have long cited social and environmental responsibility as intrinsic to their business models. Accordingly, consumer criteria for fine jewellery purchase decisions are now likely to include ethical business practices (Muskawa 2014), although research in this area remains scant (Moraes et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%