2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2016.04.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical analysis: Electronic and optical properties of gold-silicon nanoalloy clusters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the molecular structures of rGO 1H-E (armchair; E gap = 1.503 eV) and 2H1e-LCL (zigzag; E gap = 2.052 eV) exhibit the highest band gap energy, and the molecular structures of rGO 2H-LL (armchair; E gap = 0.326 eV) and 2H-LL (zigzag; E gap = 0.469 eV) exhibit the lowest band gap energy. Therefore, the 1H-E armchair structures and 2H1e-LCL zigzag are the molecules least likely to respond against any external disturbance, 31 which generates low reactivity in the system, as expected; whereas, the 2H-LL armchair and zigzag structures exhibit the greatest softness and the greatest reactivity.…”
Section: ■ Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Thus, the molecular structures of rGO 1H-E (armchair; E gap = 1.503 eV) and 2H1e-LCL (zigzag; E gap = 2.052 eV) exhibit the highest band gap energy, and the molecular structures of rGO 2H-LL (armchair; E gap = 0.326 eV) and 2H-LL (zigzag; E gap = 0.469 eV) exhibit the lowest band gap energy. Therefore, the 1H-E armchair structures and 2H1e-LCL zigzag are the molecules least likely to respond against any external disturbance, 31 which generates low reactivity in the system, as expected; whereas, the 2H-LL armchair and zigzag structures exhibit the greatest softness and the greatest reactivity.…”
Section: ■ Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Zeng et al [ 57 ] report Au–Au distances of 2.76–3.62 Å in Au40 and Au52 clusters. A computational analysis of the nano‐alloy clusters of AunSi for n = 1–8 by Ranjan et al [ 58 ] finds bond lengths as follows: Au–Au of 2.48 Å, Au–Si of 2.36 Å, and Si–Si of 2.36 Å. The nearest neighbor distance in liquid Au is about 2.72 Å at 1150 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the fundamental understanding of quantum effects such as the finite-size effect, the interest in Si\\Au clusters is primarily based on their applications such as molecular electronic devices, catalyst, gas sensors, etc. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. There are three main approaches to constructing these clusters: (i) Au doped Si clusters [28][29][30][31][32]: the Au doping process can stabilize particular structures (such as a fullerene-like cage) of Si clusters and lead to unusual properties, such as size selectivity, different charge transfer, large HOMO−LUMO gaps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) Si doped Au clusters [33][34][35][36][37]: the structures of Au clusters can be changed significantly, and the reactivity and catalytic activity of Au clusters affected by Si dop-ing [37]. (iii) mixed Si\\Au clusters [38][39][40][41], where very recently, Guo et al have predicted a very stable configuration of Si12Au20 cluster [41] using electronic structure methods. The stability of Si12Au20 cluster is verified by vibrational frequency analysis, molecular dynamics simu-lations, and electronic properties such as HOMO-LUMO gap [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%