1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0030-4018(99)00497-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical analysis of self-phase locking in a type II phase-matched optical parametric oscillator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…no dichroism). We note that setting p = 0 reproduces a particular case of the polarization coupling considered in [16,17].…”
Section: A Threshold Analysismentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…no dichroism). We note that setting p = 0 reproduces a particular case of the polarization coupling considered in [16,17].…”
Section: A Threshold Analysismentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The additional vectorial degree of freedom of type-II OPO is very interesting from the point of view of possible new nonlinear phenomena. An interesting example of these new possibilities has been recently observed experimentally and described theoretically [16,17] when considering a direct intra-cavity polarization coupling: It is possible to reach a situation of frequency degeneracy and phase locking between between the orthogonally polarized signal and idler fields. This is important because, without the direct polarization coupling, a type-II OPO remains non degenerate at frequency degeneracy because of polarization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our monitoring of the phase difference and output power ratio of the subharmonic waves shows excellent agreement with the theory on self-phase-locked frequency division by 2. This proves that the divider's phase difference, which depends on the detuning of the cold cavity modes from the exact by 2 divided pump frequency [13,14] can be easily monitored via the subharmonic power ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The signal and the idler can be either frequency degenerate or non-degenerate, depending on the frequency selection rules imposed by the combined effects of the parametric down-conversion, the cavity resonances and phase-matching [29][30][31], but they are always polarization non-degenerate (type-II interaction). In the mean field approximation, and considering the paraxial and the single longitudinal mode approximation for all the fields, the equations describing the time evolution for the linear polarization components of the second harmonic (B x,y (x, y, t)) (SH) and the first harmonic (A x,y (x, y, t)) (FH) slowly varying envelopes of the electric fields, in a type-II, phase-matched OPO are [24,28]:…”
Section: Mean Field Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%