2011
DOI: 10.2174/157017811794697520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Analysis of Substituted Diels - Alder Reagents to Determine the Polar or Non Polar Character of the Reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The global electrophilicity of cyclopentadiene (CPD) is equal to 0.83eV, 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 whereas the global electrophilicity of butadiene is equal to 1.17eV. 13 In consequence, the interactions between CPD and BD have practically non-polar character. Next, small difference between global eletrophilicities is a source of weak reaction drive power, which results in the reaction conditions that require both high temperature and high pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The global electrophilicity of cyclopentadiene (CPD) is equal to 0.83eV, 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 whereas the global electrophilicity of butadiene is equal to 1.17eV. 13 In consequence, the interactions between CPD and BD have practically non-polar character. Next, small difference between global eletrophilicities is a source of weak reaction drive power, which results in the reaction conditions that require both high temperature and high pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the electron withdrawing group on the C atom of ethylene can lower the activation barriers considerably, the negative inductive effect of CC on ethylene is so weak that the matching energy gap between the orbits of CPD is still large. The global electrophilicity of cyclopentadiene (CPD) is equal to 0.83 eV, whereas the global electrophilicity of butadiene is equal to 1.17 eV . As a consequence, the interactions between CPD and BD have practically nonpolar character.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The intimate nature of the electronic rearrangement driving this type of transformations remains certainly unknown. Our main goal is the characterization of the electronic patterns governing cyclic transition states, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] therefore we will focus on the nature of bonding of the thermal decomposition of 1-chlorohexane reaction mechanism as a benchmark of this type of reactivity in gas phase. 2,4,9,10 Our discussion will be based on results from local measures of the same spin pair density distribution as given through the topological analysis of the electron localization function (ELF), 29,30 i.e., a relative but proper measure of Pauli repulsion at the local level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given these findings, it seemed appropriate to perform a similar study involving an organic dienophile and cyclopentadienes (Scheme ) and to examine whether substituent effects in such reactions were additive. More limited studies of substituent additivity in organic Diels–Alder reactions have appeared, but none explored all possible substitution permutations, refined additivity parameters, or explored dienes containing mixtures of electronically varied substituents. We, therefore, in this work computationally determined barrier and product energetics for all permutations of the reaction between Me 2 CCMe 2 , 1 , and substituted cyclopentadienes c -C 5 R 1 R 2 R 3 R 4 R 5a R 5b (R = H, CH 3 , CF 3 , F).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%