2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2022.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical analysis of the generalized finite difference method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many works have been devoted to the numerical solutions of semilinear elliptic problems such as finite element method (FEM) [2,3], finite difference method [4], finite volume element method [5] and discontinuous Galerkin method [6]. Recently, some collocation meshless (or meshfree) methods [7,8], Galerkintype meshless method [8] and generalized finite difference method [9,10] have been developed to solve the semilinear PDEs. Unlike mesh-based numerical methods, the shape functions used in the meshless methods [11][12][13][14] are linkage with nodes (or particles) scattered in the underlying computational domain, which reduces the dependence on the mesh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many works have been devoted to the numerical solutions of semilinear elliptic problems such as finite element method (FEM) [2,3], finite difference method [4], finite volume element method [5] and discontinuous Galerkin method [6]. Recently, some collocation meshless (or meshfree) methods [7,8], Galerkintype meshless method [8] and generalized finite difference method [9,10] have been developed to solve the semilinear PDEs. Unlike mesh-based numerical methods, the shape functions used in the meshless methods [11][12][13][14] are linkage with nodes (or particles) scattered in the underlying computational domain, which reduces the dependence on the mesh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the GFDM is a meshless method that can arrange irregular nodes, it has unique advantages in dealing with problems with complex geometric boundaries. Many researchers have improved and perfected the GFDM through in-depth research over time [25][26][27], making its theoretical basis more mature and its application scope more extensive. The research of Hidayat [28] further demonstrates the effectiveness of the GFDM in solving two-dimensional elastic static problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research on acoustic problems has aroused much attention in past decades. The methods for solving acoustic problems mainly include experiments, analytical methods (and semi-analytical methods) [1], and numerical methods [2][3][4][5]. Experiments usually require much expense and suitable experimental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%