2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-06395-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical and experimental evaluation of no-slip feeding condition in ECAP-Conform of a square-section metallic rod

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, they have presented a slip threshold criterion (STC) for performing the ECAP-C process successfully. There was a difference of about 11% between analytical and experimental method [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Also, they have presented a slip threshold criterion (STC) for performing the ECAP-C process successfully. There was a difference of about 11% between analytical and experimental method [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Among the greatest advantages of these methods is that they impart shear mixing via imposing shear strain and thus promote generation of dislocations, formation of substructure, polygonization, and subsequent grain refinement, all of which introduce changes in mechanical, electrical, and utility properties [8,9]. SPD methods, such as HPT (high pressure torsion) [10], ECAP (equal channel angular pressing) [11] and related methods -TCAP (twist channel angular pressing) [12], TCMAP (twist channel multi angular pressing) [13], ECAP-Conform [14], etc. -TE (twist extrusion) [15], FSP (friction stir processing) [16], ARB (accumulative roll bonding) [17] and others, are favourable to introduce significant substructure development and grain refinement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%