2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0141-0296(98)00056-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical and experimental study on externally plated R.C. beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…shear force W N i ði ¼ 1; 2Þ the transverse displacement in adherend ''i'' induced by the longitudinal forces b 2 the width of the soffit plate q the uniformly distributed load t i (i = 1, 2) the thickness of adherend ''i'' t a the thickness of adhesive u 1 the longitudinal displacement at the base of adherend 1 u 2 the longitudinal displacement at the top of adherend 2 u N 1 the longitudinal displacement induced by the longitudinal forces at the interface between the upper adherend and the adhesive u N 2 the longitudinal displacement induced by the longitudinal forces at the interface between the lower adherend and the adhesive w i (i = 1, 2) vertical displacements of adherend ''i'' y i (i = 1, 2) distances from the bottom of adherend 1 and the top of adherend 2 to their respective centroid e 1 strain at the base of adherend 1 e 2 strain at the top of adherend 2 e M i ði ¼ 1; 2Þ strains induced by the bending moment at the adherend ''i'' e N i ði ¼ 1; 2Þ strains induced by the longitudinal forces at the adherend ''i'' r xy(i) (i = 1, 2) the shear stresses in adherend ''i'' r n the normal stress in the adhesive c i (i = 1, 2) the shear strain in adherend ''i'' s a the shear stresses through the thickness of adhesive r N i ði ¼ 1; 2Þ longitudinal normal stresses for adherend ''i'' been made by Oehlers (1992), Baluch et al (1995) and Raoof et al (2000) for RC beams bonded with steel plates and Smith and Teng (2002a,b), Saadatmanesh and Malek (1998), Yuan et al (2004) and Gao et al (2005) for RC beams bonded with FRP plates. Accurate predictions of interfacial stresses are thus important for designing against debonding failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shear force W N i ði ¼ 1; 2Þ the transverse displacement in adherend ''i'' induced by the longitudinal forces b 2 the width of the soffit plate q the uniformly distributed load t i (i = 1, 2) the thickness of adherend ''i'' t a the thickness of adhesive u 1 the longitudinal displacement at the base of adherend 1 u 2 the longitudinal displacement at the top of adherend 2 u N 1 the longitudinal displacement induced by the longitudinal forces at the interface between the upper adherend and the adhesive u N 2 the longitudinal displacement induced by the longitudinal forces at the interface between the lower adherend and the adhesive w i (i = 1, 2) vertical displacements of adherend ''i'' y i (i = 1, 2) distances from the bottom of adherend 1 and the top of adherend 2 to their respective centroid e 1 strain at the base of adherend 1 e 2 strain at the top of adherend 2 e M i ði ¼ 1; 2Þ strains induced by the bending moment at the adherend ''i'' e N i ði ¼ 1; 2Þ strains induced by the longitudinal forces at the adherend ''i'' r xy(i) (i = 1, 2) the shear stresses in adherend ''i'' r n the normal stress in the adhesive c i (i = 1, 2) the shear strain in adherend ''i'' s a the shear stresses through the thickness of adhesive r N i ði ¼ 1; 2Þ longitudinal normal stresses for adherend ''i'' been made by Oehlers (1992), Baluch et al (1995) and Raoof et al (2000) for RC beams bonded with steel plates and Smith and Teng (2002a,b), Saadatmanesh and Malek (1998), Yuan et al (2004) and Gao et al (2005) for RC beams bonded with FRP plates. Accurate predictions of interfacial stresses are thus important for designing against debonding failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, the theoretical model of [16] indicated a substantial increase in peeling capacity with increase in b p =t p ratio. In contradiction to Macdonald [30], b p =t p ratio did not affect the mode of failure.…”
Section: Plate Width To Thickness Ratio B P =T Pmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In addition, there are parameters that have little or no influence on premature failures; for example, variation of compressive strength of concrete [16][17][18].…”
Section: Secondary or Existing Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of the bolt anchorage to the beam ductility was found to increase with increasing plate thickness. Raoof et al (2000) were able to establish that the premature plate peeling failure can be prevented by increasing the concrete strength, the ratio of the beam width to the plate width, the diameters of the internal tension rebars, and the number of layers of tension reinforcement. The experiments conducted by Sallam et al (2004) indicated that the ductility of a plated RC beam can be improved by replacing the cover concrete in the plate curtailment regions with a grout of higher strength or applying initial compressive stresses to the plate by pressing it against the beam with the help of clamps or bolts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%