2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical and experimental study on precast reinforced concrete wall panels subjected to shear force

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specimen outlines and reinforcement details are presented in Todut et al [27,28]. The strengthened elements were renamed using a specific notation: the suffix T/R refers to elements initially tested prior to failure, thereafter retrofitted and retested; R/T for elements retrofitted initially on undamaged elements and tested; and the reference elements tested initially have the suffix (T).…”
Section: Experimental Specimens and Test Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specimen outlines and reinforcement details are presented in Todut et al [27,28]. The strengthened elements were renamed using a specific notation: the suffix T/R refers to elements initially tested prior to failure, thereafter retrofitted and retested; R/T for elements retrofitted initially on undamaged elements and tested; and the reference elements tested initially have the suffix (T).…”
Section: Experimental Specimens and Test Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M30 indicates that the bolt has a diameter of 30 mm. Bolts made of low-carbon alloy steel or medium-carbon steel and subjected to heat treatment (quenching and tempering) are known as highstrength bolts, and the remaining are collectively referred to as ordinary bolts (Todut, Dan, and Stoian 2014). Figure 24 shows a reinforcement drawing of the test piece.…”
Section: Test Piece Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deformation capacity of precast walls was inferior to cast-in-situ walls, but both ultimate displacement drifts exceeded 1/100. Ductility evaluation remains conventional because of the difficulty in a well-defined yield point [13,17]. Park [18], Priestley [19], and Salonikios et al [20] have devoted research to the yield displacement.…”
Section: Stiffness Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%