2011
DOI: 10.1037/a0021097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical and statistical derivation of a screener for the behavioral assessment of executive functions in children.

Abstract: The problem of valid measurement of psychological constructs remains an impediment to scientific progress, and the measurement of executive functions is not an exception. This study examined the statistical and theoretical derivation of a behavioral screener for the estimation of executive functions in children from the well-established Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC). The original national standardization sample of the BASC-Teacher Rating Scales for children ages 6 through 11 was used (N = 2,16… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
102
2
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(131 reference statements)
11
102
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Relatedly, EF was examined only through parent-reported questionnaire data and not through performance-based tasks. While the incorporation of such tasks would have strengthened the assessment of EF, the use of behaviorally-based questionnaires has been advocated as a more ecological-relevant and practical approach to assessing EF in youth (Garcia-Barrera, Kamphaus, & Bandalos, 2011). Also notable is recent research by Toplak and colleagues (2013) who describe performance-based tasks and behavioral ratings as each assessing unique aspects of EF with little overlapping variance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatedly, EF was examined only through parent-reported questionnaire data and not through performance-based tasks. While the incorporation of such tasks would have strengthened the assessment of EF, the use of behaviorally-based questionnaires has been advocated as a more ecological-relevant and practical approach to assessing EF in youth (Garcia-Barrera, Kamphaus, & Bandalos, 2011). Also notable is recent research by Toplak and colleagues (2013) who describe performance-based tasks and behavioral ratings as each assessing unique aspects of EF with little overlapping variance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method extends previous work that aimed to identify ADHD in BCS70 (Brassett‐Grundy & Butler, ) by adhering more closely to the current definition of ADHD and estimating a more precise dimensional measure. We also built upon the work of Garcia‐Barrera et al () by incorporating a data mining framework, more nuanced modeling technique, validation through comparisons with mapped reference scales (e.g., SDQ), and epidemiology. Furthermore, we have replicated part of Wall et al () by reusing the ZIMM model, strengthening their findings, and applying the model to a different psychiatric construct (ADHD).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They aggregated items and standardized as a general approach. Garcia‐Barrera, Kamphaus, and Bandalos () derived a scale to screen for executive function difficulties using items from the Behavior Assessment System for Children in an existing dataset. They mapped Behavior Assessment System for Children items to four executive function domains and estimated dimensional measures using factor analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A typical CFA analysis of individual differences approach statistically extracts what is common among the tasks selected to tap the same putative executive mechanism and then uses that purer latent variable factor to determine the interrelations between the different executive mechanisms. CFA has been widely applied in social psychology but has been also successfully employed in the cognitive domain to explore the underlying mechanisms that subserve executive abilities in schoolaged children (eg., Garcia-Barrera, Kamphaus, & Bandalos, 2011;Garcia-Barrera, Karr, & Kamphaus, 2013), young adults (e.g., Friedman et al, 2008; and older adults (Hull, Martin, Beier, Lane, & Hamilton, 2008).…”
Section: Control Mechanism?mentioning
confidence: 99%