2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00419-018-1392-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical approach of characterizing the crack-tip constraint effects associated with material’s fracture toughness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently different variations of Anderson -Dodds -Kirk unified measure of constraint have been considered and theoretical investigation on their validity has been performed (e.g. see [45,46]). For example, a CTOD based unified measure of constraint, .…”
Section: Unified Measure Of Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently different variations of Anderson -Dodds -Kirk unified measure of constraint have been considered and theoretical investigation on their validity has been performed (e.g. see [45,46]). For example, a CTOD based unified measure of constraint, .…”
Section: Unified Measure Of Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that the two parameters A p and A d can characterize both in‐plane and out‐of‐plane constraints for specimens and cracked components under both brittle and ductile fracture conditions 24–26 . Recent theoretical analyses and experimental investigations in the literature 5,27,28 further verify the ability of the crack‐tip plastic area to measure both in‐plane and out‐of‐plane constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Constraints can be divided into in-plane and out-of-plane constraints, 3 and the former is associated with crack depth, specimen geometry, and loading type, whereas the latter is mainly related to the specimen thickness. 4,5 Various constraint parameters have been proposed by researchers to quantify the constraint effects, and their capabilities for characterizing both constraints are different. The linear-elastic T-stress (T 11 ), 6 A 2 , 7 A, [8][9][10] and Q 11,12 can characterize the in-plane constraint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21][22] To capture both in-plane and out-of-plane constraints in structures containing defects, over the last decade, the unified constraint parameters have been investigated and developed. 1,2,[32][33][34][35][36] These parameters are usually defined based on the area or size of the crack-tip plastic zone. Because the essence of constraint is an obstruction of a structure geometry against the plastic deformation at the crack tip, 37 overall constraint level (it consists of both constraints) in a structure or specimen may be directly measured by the plastic deformation amount around the crack tip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In applying these correlation equations in fracture assessment, the out‐of‐plane constraint effect in actual three‐dimensional (3D) defective structures may not be fully captured 19–22 . To capture both in‐plane and out‐of‐plane constraints in structures containing defects, over the last decade, the unified constraint parameters have been investigated and developed 1,2,32–36 . These parameters are usually defined based on the area or size of the crack‐tip plastic zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%