2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2005.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical calculation of SSNTD response for radon measurements and optimum diffusion chambers dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The (1.5, 9.5) chamber was made of aluminum to prevent the entrance of radon through the chamber body and the (4, 6) chamber doped with carbon that absorbs some radon atoms from the effective volume around the detector. It is clear that the obtained values from our work have a good agreement with the experimental values [10].…”
Section: Discussion and Comparison With Other Authorssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The (1.5, 9.5) chamber was made of aluminum to prevent the entrance of radon through the chamber body and the (4, 6) chamber doped with carbon that absorbs some radon atoms from the effective volume around the detector. It is clear that the obtained values from our work have a good agreement with the experimental values [10].…”
Section: Discussion and Comparison With Other Authorssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The calculated CR-39 responses were listed in Table 3 and compared with the corresponding theoretical and experimental values [10]. The (1.5, 9.5) chamber was made of aluminum to prevent the entrance of radon through the chamber body and the (4, 6) chamber doped with carbon that absorbs some radon atoms from the effective volume around the detector.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparison With Other Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations