2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2015.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical considerations for thresholds in chemical carcinogenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data in a and b represent means ± SEM of three independent experiments. Data in c and d are from one experiment biological consequences and high mutagenic potential, as shown previously for O 6 -methyl-Gua (Thomas et al 2015). In cells, Batal et al determined similar adduct levels as in isolated DNA after SM treatment, while CEES induced about 10% less mono-alkylated guanine adducts in cells than in CT-DNA (Batal et al 2013a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Data in a and b represent means ± SEM of three independent experiments. Data in c and d are from one experiment biological consequences and high mutagenic potential, as shown previously for O 6 -methyl-Gua (Thomas et al 2015). In cells, Batal et al determined similar adduct levels as in isolated DNA after SM treatment, while CEES induced about 10% less mono-alkylated guanine adducts in cells than in CT-DNA (Batal et al 2013a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Moreover, it is hypothesised that detoxifying processes can prevent genotoxin activation, subsequent DNA reaction and adduct formation and, therefore, contribute to a non-linear DNA adduct relationship (Thomas et al 2015). The half-life of the DNA adducts (governed by their removal by repair enzymes, such as MGMT) may influence the relationship observed depending on the time following treatment when the adducts were quantified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under normal conditions, the steady state level of endogenous DNA damage was recently estimated at ≥50,000 lesions per cell; the non-instructional and pro-mutagenic abasic sites are the most common DNA lesions, present daily at ~30,000 nucleoside sites in DNA per cell [18, 22, 24]. DNA repair influences the outcome and dose-response of mutation and chromosome damage following exposure to DNA damaging agents at all exposure levels [11-15]. DNA repair is usually error-free, but there may be rare events where the mis-repair will result in genotoxic outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%