2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Description of the Structural Characteristics of the Quaternized SEBS Anion-Exchange Membrane Using DFT

Abstract: For four conforming structures of the quaternized polystyreneblock-poly(ethylene-ran-butylene)-block-polystyrene membrane (QSEBS), (a) tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMA + OH − ), (b) benzyltrimetylammonium hydroxide, and (c and d) QSEBS segments with 1 and 2 side chains (DBQSEBS), spatial distribution, bond distances, and charge-density profiles were obtained with density functional theory (DFT) and compared with structural simulations of DBQSEBS for two different hydration levels. Results for the TMA + OH − … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PS phase not only is responsible for ion conduction but also provides chemical/mechanical stability to these AEMs while the rubbery PEB phase, which accounts for a large proportion of SEBS, has no contribution to these two factors. As a result, the SEBS AEMs show low dimensional stability in water because the ammonium‐functionalized PS phase has high water uptake weakening the mechanical strength 39–43 . This can be typically addressed by cross‐linking the functionalized PS phase, which improves the mechanical properties at the cost of conductivity and solubility 44–46 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PS phase not only is responsible for ion conduction but also provides chemical/mechanical stability to these AEMs while the rubbery PEB phase, which accounts for a large proportion of SEBS, has no contribution to these two factors. As a result, the SEBS AEMs show low dimensional stability in water because the ammonium‐functionalized PS phase has high water uptake weakening the mechanical strength 39–43 . This can be typically addressed by cross‐linking the functionalized PS phase, which improves the mechanical properties at the cost of conductivity and solubility 44–46 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the SEBS AEMs show low dimensional stability in water because the ammonium-functionalized PS phase has high water uptake weakening the mechanical strength. [39][40][41][42][43] This can be typically addressed by cross-linking the functionalized PS phase, which improves the mechanical properties at the cost of conductivity and solubility. [44][45][46] For example, Jeon and coworkers cross-linked the PS units with 1,6-hexanediamine, which, significantly reduced water uptake (e.g., 155% vs 28%) and enhanced their mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of the polymer backbone in the DFT calculations can validate whether the backbone contributes to the AEM degradation. DFT studies of polystyrene and quaternised poly (styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene) (QSEBS) with BTMA functionality proved the stability of styrene‐based polymers against backbone degradation . However, theoretical studies of polyaromatic‐based backbone tethered with BTMA functional group revealed backbone degradation due to a lower barrier energy of OH − initiated aryl‐ether scission than the nucleophilic substitution reaction .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DFT studies of polystyrene [37] and quaternised poly (styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene) (QSEBS) with BTMA functionality proved the stability of styrene-based polymers against backbone degradation. [38] However, theoretical studies of polyaromatic-based backbone tethered with BTMA functional group revealed backbone degradation due to a lower barrier energy of OH − initiated aryl-ether scission than the nucleophilic substitution reaction. [39] This agrees with the systematic study of Mohanty et al [40] on different polymer backbones and concluded that all carbon-based repeating units (ie, absence of aryl-ether bonds) are promising candidates for AEM that exhibits long-term alkaline stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its electrochemical performance, especially ionic conductivity, still has a big disparity with those of PEM, so new membranes for low‐temperature AEM fuel cells urgently need to be found and utilized. To date, much effort has been put into AEM development, and lots of promising candidates have been researched for use in alkaline fuel cells, including HIPTPES‐OH, PPO–TPQP, PBI/IL‐GO, CTS‐LCRD, QSEBS, and radiation grafted [VPSIm][OH] . However, these membranes generally have various disadvantages, such as high expense, complex quaternization process, low OH − conductivity, instability in alkaline media, high fuel permeability, and poor mechanical and thermal stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%