2011
DOI: 10.3813/aaa.918441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Determination of the Random-Incidence Scattering Coefficients of Infinite Rigid Surfaces with a Periodic Rectangular Roughness Profile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This coefficient can be measured under free field or random incidence in the laboratory [3,4,5]. It can also be computed for some typical, periodic or random roughness profiles [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This coefficient can be measured under free field or random incidence in the laboratory [3,4,5]. It can also be computed for some typical, periodic or random roughness profiles [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that there are large structures in the actual building façade, i.e., sizable rectangles on Street 3-FA. When the dimensions of the plane surface are significantly larger than the wavelength, it functions similarly to a specular reflector rather than a diffuser [43]. Therefore, rectangular structures with large plane surfaces (the ratio of the dimension of the surface to the wavelength was larger than 10, 6.8 m for 500 Hz) were considered as planes rather than diffusers when counting the coverage density.…”
Section: Estimation Of Acoustic Parameters Of Building Façadesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 12 shows normal-incidence scattering coefficients of Sample R1 in the two orientations, determined from the measured reverberation times for various decay ranges. The grey solid and dotted lines represent theoretical results for the infinite sample [16], and numerical results for the sample 3 m square (750 mm square in 1/4 scale) [17], respectively. Although the measured results are obviously unreliable below 500 Hz, good agreement is generally seen between the measured and numerical results.…”
Section: Measurement Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to establish the proposed method, 1/4-scale experiments are performed to examine the two points: the measurement procedure for energy decay evaluation to determine onedimensional reverberation times, and the test arrangement, such as the dimensions of the room and the size and orientation of the sample. Furthermore, the validity of the measurement method is discussed in comparison with theoretical results for infinite surfaces [16], and numerical results for finite samples in the free field [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%