2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.92.015015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical direct WIMP detection rates for transitions to the first excited state inKr83

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, however, we assume that the detector is going to be a bolometer, which is characterized by a quenching factor approximately unity. So in this case the inelastic channel cannot benefit as much from the fact that the quenching factor tends to suppress the ground state transition in the presence of significant energy threshold as found previously [54,73].…”
Section: A Results For the Differential Event Ratesmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, however, we assume that the detector is going to be a bolometer, which is characterized by a quenching factor approximately unity. So in this case the inelastic channel cannot benefit as much from the fact that the quenching factor tends to suppress the ground state transition in the presence of significant energy threshold as found previously [54,73].…”
Section: A Results For the Differential Event Ratesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The configurations of the 1/2 + and 3/2 + states are ν3s 1/2 and ν2d 3/2 , respectively, while the configurations of 5/2 + and 7/2 + are mixed character of both ν3s 1/2 and ν2d 3/2 orbits. We have also calculated electromagnetic properties which are shown in Tables III and IV The static spin matrix elements (MEs) obtained from this calculation are Ω 0 = 1.456, Ω 1 = −1.502 for elastic transitions, Looking at these matrix elements we notice that the nuclear matrix elements relevant for the inelastic scattering are, as expected, smaller than those entering the elastic scattering, but they are not suppressed as much as those relevant for the target 83 Kr [54], the latter favored kinematically due to its lower excitation energy. We also notice that the nuclear structure does not favor the isoscalar contribution to overcome the suppression of the corresponding isoscalar amplitude due to the structure of the nucleon.…”
Section: Shell-model Interpretation Of the Spin Structure Functimentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations