2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical evaluation of the advantages and limitations of constant pressure versus constant flow rate gradient elution separation in supercritical fluid chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While constant flow mode is limited by the pressure associated with the maximum viscosity of the mobile phase in the column [25]. Performing gradient separations at constant pressure is attractive as the analysis time is sped up, thereby increasing throughput [26,27]. A disadvantage to constant pressure systems depends on the quantitation aspects of mass-sensitive detectors with a nebulizing interface, such as ESI, where the varying flow rate can contribute to a reduction in nebulizer efficiency [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While constant flow mode is limited by the pressure associated with the maximum viscosity of the mobile phase in the column [25]. Performing gradient separations at constant pressure is attractive as the analysis time is sped up, thereby increasing throughput [26,27]. A disadvantage to constant pressure systems depends on the quantitation aspects of mass-sensitive detectors with a nebulizing interface, such as ESI, where the varying flow rate can contribute to a reduction in nebulizer efficiency [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can mention that De Pauw et al also theoretically investigated the benefits of constant pressure against constant flow rate gradient elution [104]. So, they developed a model of the density of the fluid during gradient elution.…”
Section: Methods Development and Sfcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem can alleviated by applying a concomitant composition and flow rate gradient, where the latter decreases during the run to compensate for the higher viscosity [42]. The flow rate gradient can be programmed such that an almost constant pressure is achieved during the run [43][44][45] or at least that it never exceeds the pressure limitation of the instrument. This requires some trial-and-error as the adsorption of mobile phase components on the stationary phase can affect the pressure profile [42].…”
Section: Effect Of Mobile Phase Composition and Separation Conditions...mentioning
confidence: 99%