2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1075404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Flaws in the Use of the CAPM For Investment Decisions

Abstract: Abstract. This paper uses counterexamples and simple formalization to show that the standard CAPM-based Net Present Value may not be used for investment valuations. The reason is that the standard CAPM-based capital budgeting criterion implies a notion of value which does not comply with the principle of additivity. Framing effects arise in decisions so that different descriptions of the same problem lead to different choices. As a result, the CAPM-based NPV as a tool for valuing projects and making investment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those tests show mixed results which the author attributes to (i) a lagging arbitrage mechanism (it takes time to merge and demerge company structures), (ii) a natural risk diversification amongst activities of most companies, and (iii) agency costs related to management not strictly aligning their objectives with those of shareholders. The value additivity principle is also contested on other theoretical grounds: see for example Magni (2007). positive to negative skewness (investing cash flow).…”
Section: Evolution Of Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those tests show mixed results which the author attributes to (i) a lagging arbitrage mechanism (it takes time to merge and demerge company structures), (ii) a natural risk diversification amongst activities of most companies, and (iii) agency costs related to management not strictly aligning their objectives with those of shareholders. The value additivity principle is also contested on other theoretical grounds: see for example Magni (2007). positive to negative skewness (investing cash flow).…”
Section: Evolution Of Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%