PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering &Amp; Technology 2009
DOI: 10.1109/picmet.2009.5261940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical framework for managing the front end of innovation under uncertainty

Abstract: A growing body of research suggests that the fuzzy front-end of product development should not be managed with a one-size-fits-all standard process. Instead, projects with different market and technical uncertainties should be managed with one of five different processes (linear, recursive, evolving, selectionism, trial-and-error). Based on a review of the literature, the paper develops a theoretical framework for frontend management which provides the foundation for ongoing empirical research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New product development literature may shed some light on diverse approaches for frontand back-end innovation. Sperry and Jetter (2009) propose that a front-end innovation process requires room for iterations, while a back-end innovation process might be better defined and thus processes can be linear. The authors depict five different processes that can be applied:…”
Section: Business Model Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New product development literature may shed some light on diverse approaches for frontand back-end innovation. Sperry and Jetter (2009) propose that a front-end innovation process requires room for iterations, while a back-end innovation process might be better defined and thus processes can be linear. The authors depict five different processes that can be applied:…”
Section: Business Model Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No specific relationships for product-firm compatibility variables were mentioned in this study, however. The finding in the Yap and Souder study, however, is important because the significant relationships mentioned above hold also under all market and technical uncertainty conditions, which are characteristic to high-technology markets (Mohr, 2001;Sperry & Jetter, 2009), and might not always be controllable in highly turbulent conditions (Droge, Calantone, & Harmancioglu, 2008). Finally a recent study by Harmancioglu, Droge, and Calantone (2009) studied the roles of strategic fit of the NPD venture to existing resources, and discovered that marketing fit and technology fit were positively related to profitability and the new product advantage.…”
Section: Npd and Product-firm Compatibility In Technology Companiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…From the 27 studies analyzed, 44 quote was found. In the studies surveyed there is not a single label to the sources, it is common in some articles to speak from a particular source that is a single uncertainty, but classified differently, for example: market source [21], [17], [25], [22], [31], [32], external source [33] and novel source [11], [2] represent a single source of uncertainty.…”
Section: What Are the Sources Of Uncertainty Perceived?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, if they are not well understood it is necessary to guide the project to the desired goal. The market uncertainty comprehends client, suppliers, partners and current market situation [11], [13], [21], [17], [25], [22], [2], [29], [31], [32], [33].…”
Section: Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation