2006
DOI: 10.2202/1940-1639.1481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Frameworks in Qualitative Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this understanding, a blended framework was employed drawing on the sense of belonging literature and Tinto' s (1993) interactionalist theory of student retention. Similar to Anfara and Mertz (2006), this seemed to be a useful procedure for understanding a latent, complex abstraction (i.e., sense of belonging) and explaining how diverse interactions might influence the extent to which students belong.…”
Section: A Blended Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this understanding, a blended framework was employed drawing on the sense of belonging literature and Tinto' s (1993) interactionalist theory of student retention. Similar to Anfara and Mertz (2006), this seemed to be a useful procedure for understanding a latent, complex abstraction (i.e., sense of belonging) and explaining how diverse interactions might influence the extent to which students belong.…”
Section: A Blended Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a story that provides new insights and broadens understanding of the phenomenon. A useful theory should provide a simple explanation of the observed relations relevant to a phenomenon, should be consistent with both the observed relations and an already established body of knowledge, be considered a tentative explanation and provide means for verification and revision, and stimulate further research in areas that need investigation (McMillan & Schumacher, 2001 as cited by Anfara & Mertz, 2006, p. xvii).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this research and the resulting list of theories should not become a tool for encouraging “theory reuse.” Theory reuse is exhibited when authors simply cite a theory, typically found in another's scholarly work, with little effort to develop, test, and enhance the theory and its application. Anfara and Mertz (2006) suggest that relatively inexperienced researchers often restrict the application of theory to those with which they are familiar (another type of “theory reuse”). Instead, it is the expectation of the researchers that these findings and discussion will encourage expert scholars to continue this process of examination to shape the theoretical landscape in the discipline by building, modifying, and categorizing existing and new theories.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative data analysis can be theoretically driven (see Anfara & Mertz, 2006) and we took this approach to hypothesise that the concept of homophily might be a lens through which to think about these questions. We identified how service users and carers talked about satisfaction and preferences and their views appeared to fall into four ''ideal'' types, leading to the development of a tentative typology.For the purposes of this paper, the data were re-examined to explore the extent to which the concept of homophily could help tease out different perceptions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%