2013
DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20121217-02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Framing of High-Fidelity Simulation With Carper’s Fundamental Patterns of Knowing in Nursing

Abstract: Many nursing programs integrate high-fidelity simulation(HFS) into the curriculum. The manikins used are modeled to resemble humans and are programmed to talk and reproduce physiological functions via computer interfaces.When HFS design negates a theoretical framework consistent with the interpersonal and relational nature of nursing,it can problematically focus simulation on psychomotor skills and the physical body. This article highlights a theorized approach to HFS design informed by Carper's seminal work o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the empirical pattern or way of knowing is perhaps most clearly addressed in our exemplar of team-based research, pursuing team science by incorporating other ways of knowing could also provide nursing scholars with new ways to conceptualize ethical or societal questions or philosophically evaluate the uniqueness of each patient’s symptoms in the context of life experiences. Or, as McGovern, Lapum, Clune, and Martin did in 2013, one might frame forays into testing the benefits of new educational initiatives such as high-fidelity simulation, within the context of multiple patterns of knowing. Ultimately, while stepping outside one’s area of expertise or inviting others onto your team may be difficult and carry some risk, the rewards are often high and the impact on patients and families substantial—the essence and goal of nursing science.…”
Section: Conclusion: Another Way Of Knowingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the empirical pattern or way of knowing is perhaps most clearly addressed in our exemplar of team-based research, pursuing team science by incorporating other ways of knowing could also provide nursing scholars with new ways to conceptualize ethical or societal questions or philosophically evaluate the uniqueness of each patient’s symptoms in the context of life experiences. Or, as McGovern, Lapum, Clune, and Martin did in 2013, one might frame forays into testing the benefits of new educational initiatives such as high-fidelity simulation, within the context of multiple patterns of knowing. Ultimately, while stepping outside one’s area of expertise or inviting others onto your team may be difficult and carry some risk, the rewards are often high and the impact on patients and families substantial—the essence and goal of nursing science.…”
Section: Conclusion: Another Way Of Knowingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is crucial to dig beyond the surface of the one-to-one encounters and to consider what shapes those connections to act with intention to build trust, compassion, and respect (Doane & Brown, 2011;Doane & Varcoe, 2007, 2015. McGovern et al (2013) propose the use of Carper's patterns of knowing as a framework for teaching nursing students how to recognize relational cues in high fidelity simulations. These authors believe that without framing the experience through this lens, the potential for preoccupation with a psychomotor acquisition could become more prominent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… McGovern et al (2013) propose the use of Carper's patterns of knowing as a framework for teaching nursing students how to recognize relational cues in high fidelity simulations. These authors believe that without framing the experience through this lens, the potential for preoccupation with a psychomotor acquisition could become more prominent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%