Theoretical grounding of writing centre practices: a foundation for tutor training

Abstract

A variety of factors influence the strategies and practices of writing teachers and tutors, such as beliefs about writing and how writing can be learned; following mandates by educational authorities; uncritical adherence to the latest, most fashionable practice; and poor support of writing facilitators in the contexts in which they are employed. These factors increase the need for creating among facilitators of writing an awareness of the different theoretical approaches and traditions of writing and learning to write in applied linguistics and education, as well as the pedagogic practices in writing centres that are associated with them. This paper takes as its point of departure the three main educational theories underpinning writing centre work: The Current-traditional paradigm, Expressivism and Socio-constructionism. However, we argue that theories used to characterise and justify writing centre work need to be adapted to suit specific historical and local contexts. In particular, we propose that writing in South Africa should acknowledge the need to identify theoretical and analytical lenses that are appropriate to their specific institutional contexts. The discussion of the maintheories and pertinent sub-theories is followed by a tabulated summary of each theory, underlying beliefs, associated writing centre models, tutor roles that align with each approach, and the associated tutoring strategies. The article is concluded by outlining a broadframework to underpin tutor training, which draws on powerful theories that originated in the global North as well as theories that are particularly relevant to the global South and speak to its complexities.
 Keywords: tutor roles, tutor training, writing centre models, writing centre theory, writing centre pedagogy, writing centre practices

Ubuntu in the Academic Literacy class: establishing a sense of community for inclusivity and effective learning

“…So too, students do not judge one another, but rather "help [one another] to understand the content better". The summary of students' perceptions in Figure 7, which shows that "help" or "helpfulness" from both facilitator and students was mentioned 72 times, ultimately shows this supportive environment, which links with previous research (Carstens & Rambiritch, 2020;Lunsford, 1991;Van Wyk, 2014).…”

Pseudo social media classrooms Sharing control with “the audience” as an academic literacy practitioner on an online platform

“…Consequently, students' perceptions of these tools reveal that they assist with student success within AL. Furthermore, that students feel that they can express ideas in a "safe space" means that they have the potential for future academic success, not only in AL but also in other subjects and beyond graduation (Carini, Kuh and Klein, 2006;Young & Bruce, 2011;Martin & Bolliger, 2018;Carstens & Rambiritch, 2020). Qualitative data provides further verification.…”

“…Journal for Language Teaching | Ijenali Yekufundzisa Lulwimi | Tydskrif vir Taalonderrig https://www.journals.ac.za/jlt Finally, the social constructivist approach promotes social justice through learningcentredness. Carstens and Rambiritch's (2020) research on effective teaching practices for writing demonstrates their awareness of power relations involved in learning. Here, the student is allowed voice as an "activist" while the educator maintains the position of the "commentator".…”

They just don’t get it! Towards informing course and syllabus design – an error analysis of referencing in undergraduate writing

“…Instead, many disciplinespecific cultures exist in an academic environment, but all are encompassed by a general academic culture. From an academic literacies perspective, acculturation could be considered from the perspectives of both linguistic and socio-constructivist theories (Carstens andRambiritch 2020, Halliday 1978;, Hasan 1996, Lea and Street 1998, Lillis 2001, Van Dyk and Van de Poel 2013. The essence of these is that students need to transform without losing sight of the importance of context, own voice and authority.…”