2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2404660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical interpretation of Grimme’s spin-component-scaled second order Møller-Plesset theory

Abstract: It is shown that spin-component-scaled second order Møller-Plesset theory proposed by Grimme [J. Chem. Phys. 118, 9095 (2003)] can be interpreted as a two-parameter scaling of the zero order Hamiltonian, a generalization of the approach reported by Feenberg [Phys. Rev. 103, 1116 (1956)].

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where p OS and p SS are empirical (but theoretically wellfounded) scaling factors with values of 6/5 and 1/3, respectively, which have been obtained from a fit to a set of representative reaction energies 9 (for a recent theoretical derivation of the scaling factors see ref 10). This SCS-MP2 approach differs from standard MP2, where both components contribute equally (i.e., p OS ) p SS ) 1).…”
Section: Theory Of Our Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where p OS and p SS are empirical (but theoretically wellfounded) scaling factors with values of 6/5 and 1/3, respectively, which have been obtained from a fit to a set of representative reaction energies 9 (for a recent theoretical derivation of the scaling factors see ref 10). This SCS-MP2 approach differs from standard MP2, where both components contribute equally (i.e., p OS ) p SS ) 1).…”
Section: Theory Of Our Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A theoretically well-known procedure to combine information from the second and third-orders of perturbation theory is Feenberg scaling, which has recently been discussed in the context of the SCS idea. [28] However, this approach lacks size-consistency and is therefore not suited for the computation of interaction energies.…”
Section: Eðccsdðtþ=small Basisþàeðmp2=small Basisþ: ð4þmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SCS-MP2 variant makes use of the original SCS scheme (c os = 1.20 and c ss = 0.33) proposed by Grimme [27] but many modifications of the original scheme were also proposed [28,[30][31][32][33][34]. Aside from SCS-MP2, other four variants that can be expressed by the respective SCS schemes, namely SOS-MP2 [28], FE2-MP2 [30], SCS(MI)-MP2 [31], and S2-MP [34], were adopted in the present work. These four variants differ in the values of the c os and c ss coefficients from the original SCS scheme.…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%