2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.76.165404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical investigation of the effect of graphite interlayer spacing on hydrogen absorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
65
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
65
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponds to a number of 3 to 6 lattice planes of crystalline graphite with distances between 0.35 and 0.39 nm. The lattice constants are higher than the literature value of graphite (0.335 nm; Delhaes, 2000), possibly due to adsorbed hydrogen atoms that increase the lattice plane separation (Aga et al, 2007), bending of layers, and other defects. Figure 7c represents a TEM electron diffraction of a (heat treated) Ni-C specimen.…”
Section: Film Morphologymentioning
confidence: 42%
“…This corresponds to a number of 3 to 6 lattice planes of crystalline graphite with distances between 0.35 and 0.39 nm. The lattice constants are higher than the literature value of graphite (0.335 nm; Delhaes, 2000), possibly due to adsorbed hydrogen atoms that increase the lattice plane separation (Aga et al, 2007), bending of layers, and other defects. Figure 7c represents a TEM electron diffraction of a (heat treated) Ni-C specimen.…”
Section: Film Morphologymentioning
confidence: 42%
“…The Goddard group also suggested that when the interlayer distance of alkali metal doped pillared graphite sheets is 6 A, H 2 uptake significantly increases and the maximum H 2 binding free energy between graphite layers is 10 kJ/mol [15,16]. The highest H 2 uptake reportedly occurs at a graphite interlayer space of 6.2e6.4 A [17], and at 5.3e6.0 A for a graphene interlayer [18]. In a previous work, we experimentally proved that hydrogen storage capacity increased by changing the interlayer distance from 1.1 nm of vanadium pentoxide to 7.2 A of polyanilineevanadium pentoxide nanocomposites [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…90 Some research groups have studied the optimum pore size for graphite using ab initio or DFT calculations, and all of them reached the same conclusion that the H 2 binding energy is maximized up to À13.0 kJ mol À1 with an interlayer distance of 6 Å . [124][125][126][127] (Here the 6 Å is just an interlayer distance of graphite, meaning a value obtained by ignoring van der Waals radii of carbon atoms in graphite. When considering the van der Waals radius, the pore size is close to the kinetic diameter (2.89 Å ) of H 2 since the maximal attraction of an adsorbate would occur at a size the same as the diameter of the adsorbate.)…”
Section: Appropriate Pore Sizementioning
confidence: 99%