2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-018-8715-y
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical investigations on enhancement of photovoltaic efficiency of nanostructured CZTS/ZnS/ZnO based solar cell device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimum thicknesses of absorber layers of CIGS, CISSe and CZTS-based solar cells were 2500, 3000 and 3000 nm respectively which were close to the thicknesses found in the literatures [6,9,46]. At their corresponding optimum thicknesses, CIGS, CISSe and CZTS-based solar cells had PCEs of 15.65%, 19.73% and 16.92% respectively.…”
Section: Effect Of the Absorber Layer And Buffer Layer Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimum thicknesses of absorber layers of CIGS, CISSe and CZTS-based solar cells were 2500, 3000 and 3000 nm respectively which were close to the thicknesses found in the literatures [6,9,46]. At their corresponding optimum thicknesses, CIGS, CISSe and CZTS-based solar cells had PCEs of 15.65%, 19.73% and 16.92% respectively.…”
Section: Effect Of the Absorber Layer And Buffer Layer Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Different studies have been carried out with the aim to offset the first generation thick crystalline silicon (Si) film-based [2] photovoltaic technology due to the high cost, energy-intensive manufacturing process of silicon in bulk [3] and consequently, the study of second generation solar cell based on thin film technology using semiconductor material such as copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS), copper zinc tin sulfide (CZTS) [4] etc has started. 13% market share consists of amorphous silicon, quantum dots, polycrystalline cadmium telluride (CdTe) thin films and CIGS solar cells [5] and reduced manufacturing costs, high conversion efficiency and also, outstanding stability in different conditions are mandatory for increasing this market share [6]. Si-based solar cell has achieved up to 24.5% efficiency, whereas CdTe-based solar cell has achieved around 21% [7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of CZTS layer is reduced to 100 nm (case “c” of Figure 8B) to obtain current matching with the bottom cell after the replacement of buffer layer. The optimized thickness of ZnS layer is considered as 30 nm 16 for minimizing the photon losses, and the current density is increased (case “d” of Figure 8B). Further, to minimize the parasitic absorption, the window layer thickness is reduced slightly to 300 nm in case “e.” Owing to the presence of ITO layer which itself can act as a window layer for the bottom cell, the AZO window layer is eliminated from the design in case “f” resulting in more efficient absorption by top and bottom absorbers (case “e” and “f” of Figure 8B), and the current matching is not disturbed with an increase in current density.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The single‐junction and the dual‐junction simulations are carried out using ATLAS 2D simulator 15 where the Poisson's equation and carrier continuity equations are self consistently solved to evaluate the potential at each and every mesh point. SRH recombination mechanism is used to obtain the recombination statistics 15,16 to account for the phonon transitions and radiative recombination is incorporated for direct band gap materials by specifying the radiative recombination rate coefficient. Auger recombination is considered for both top and bottom cell absorber materials.…”
Section: Simulation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this simulation, different values of acceptor density (NA) are chosen from 1 × 10 12 cm -3 to 1 × 10 19 cm -3 to comprehend how they impact PSC performance. layer reduces depletion gap and enhances electric field (Meher et al 2016;Vallisree et al 2018). According to Fig.…”
Section: Impact Of Varying the Density Of Active Layermentioning
confidence: 99%