2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical kinetics predictions for NH2 + HO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Very recently, Klippenstein and Glarborg 34 used the VTST to predict the microcanonical rate constant of reaction R8, which was then incorporated in the master equation treatments of the temperature-and pressure-dependent kinetics. As seen from Figure 1, the calculated rate constants by Klippenstein and Glarborg 34 and Stagni et al 33 show much better agreement with the measured results by Sarkisov et al 29 and Glarborg et al 30…”
Section: Kinetic Modelingsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Very recently, Klippenstein and Glarborg 34 used the VTST to predict the microcanonical rate constant of reaction R8, which was then incorporated in the master equation treatments of the temperature-and pressure-dependent kinetics. As seen from Figure 1, the calculated rate constants by Klippenstein and Glarborg 34 and Stagni et al 33 show much better agreement with the measured results by Sarkisov et al 29 and Glarborg et al 30…”
Section: Kinetic Modelingsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…A recent work on the rate constant calculation of reaction was performed by Stagni et al based on the VTST at the CCSD­(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ//M06-2X/aug-cc-pVTZ level. Very recently, Klippenstein and Glarborg used the VTST to predict the microcanonical rate constant of reaction , which was then incorporated in the master equation treatments of the temperature- and pressure-dependent kinetics. As seen from Figure , the calculated rate constants by Klippenstein and Glarborg and Stagni et al show much better agreement with the measured results by Sarkisov et al and Glarborg et al than the other calculated results.…”
Section: Kinetic Modelingsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations