Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice 2016
DOI: 10.1201/9781315374987-153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical learning outcome of night driving. A comparison study of traditional real life training and simulator training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finland started using driving simulators primarily for night driving, since real-life night training is difficult in certain parts of the year (Mikkonen, 2007). Practicing night driving as well as long distances to reach an urban environment are motives expressed in Norway (Robertsen et al, 2016;Saetren et al, 2018), where, as in Sweden and Denmark, simulators are not yet widespread ( Ābele et al, 2019;Selander & Thorslund, 2021). More densely populated countries, like France and Germany, have a lack of driving instructors or financial motives for replacing some of the driver training with driving simulators (Fretay, 2022;Reindl et al, 2016).…”
Section: Simulators For Driver Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finland started using driving simulators primarily for night driving, since real-life night training is difficult in certain parts of the year (Mikkonen, 2007). Practicing night driving as well as long distances to reach an urban environment are motives expressed in Norway (Robertsen et al, 2016;Saetren et al, 2018), where, as in Sweden and Denmark, simulators are not yet widespread ( Ābele et al, 2019;Selander & Thorslund, 2021). More densely populated countries, like France and Germany, have a lack of driving instructors or financial motives for replacing some of the driver training with driving simulators (Fretay, 2022;Reindl et al, 2016).…”
Section: Simulators For Driver Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They all had four different alternatives out of which only one was correct. The questions covered a broad range of topics related to the theoretical curriculum of night driving and they were based on previous questionnaires developed by Robertsen, Saetren, Haukeberg & Sivertsen (2017). In addition to the knowledge-based multiple-choice questions, we added eight questions to gather information about the learner driver and their experience: age, gender, if they have had night driving training or an introductory basic traffic course before, their experience with computer games, previous driving experience, and their preferences on how to learn night driving (simulator and traditional).…”
Section: Multiple-choice Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, The Norwegian Public Road Administrations are rather strict on what is allowed to be taught in a simulator only. Any topic that is mandatory in the education will not be approved using only a simulator (NPRA 2017), despite research indicating that for instance that the mandatory dark driving demonstrations have the same learning outcome taught in real life and in a simulator (Mikkonen 2007;Robertsen et al 2017). A different approach is taken in Finland where dark driving sessions are approved using a simulator, so these aspects are not internationally agreed upon.…”
Section: Potential Gains In Simulator Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have not been many empirical studies measuring and discussing the learning outcomes from using simulators in driving education. We only found one published study on use of simulator training in driver education in Norway (Robertsen et al 2017). This study was regarding theoretical learning outcome when comparing traditional training and simulator based training on dark driving demonstration.…”
Section: Potential Gains In Simulator Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%