2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Leidenfrost point (LFP) model for sessile droplet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8. In fact, the wall rewetting température for 2.2 kg/h is approximately 220 °C, which is close usual values of the Leidenfrost temperature found in the literature with sessile droplets onto smooth metallic hot surfaces [30][31][32]. Then, once one droplet wets the wall, the temperature close to this location decreases to values 245 below the Leidenfrost temperature and the rewetting front quickly spreads over the surface.…”
Section: Irt Results: Internai Heat Dissipation and Wall Rewettingsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…8. In fact, the wall rewetting température for 2.2 kg/h is approximately 220 °C, which is close usual values of the Leidenfrost temperature found in the literature with sessile droplets onto smooth metallic hot surfaces [30][31][32]. Then, once one droplet wets the wall, the temperature close to this location decreases to values 245 below the Leidenfrost temperature and the rewetting front quickly spreads over the surface.…”
Section: Irt Results: Internai Heat Dissipation and Wall Rewettingsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…According to the wetting layer evolution taken by the high-speed camera and the surface temperatures solved by the inverse heat transfer program, the finish temperatures of the dry surface layer (the onset temperatures of the wetting layer) for the samples with the initial temperature 600℃, 650℃, 700℃, 750℃, 800℃, 850℃, and 900℃ are approximately 424℃, 410℃, 408℃, 402℃, 395℃, 387℃, and 369℃, respectively. This temperature is LFP [10], as shown in Fig. 7.…”
Section: Wetting Layer Evolution Of Cooling Surfacementioning
confidence: 83%
“…Compared with other quenching processes, spray cooling technology has the characteristics of high heat exchange capacity, good uniformity of heat removal, no pollution to the environment, and no contact thermal resistance with overheat surface [5][6][7]. Spray cooling has a broad application prospect in heat dissipation with high heat flux [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the transition boiling regime, liquid contact occurs with portions of the surface, resulting in a significant improvement in heat transfer compared to film boiling. To predict the LFP, several models and correlations have been proposed [2][3]. These are based in several hypotheses including a Taylor-like hydrodynamic instability that can disrupt vapor pockets, or an explosive boiling caused by homogeneous nucleation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%