2007
DOI: 10.1002/polb.21213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical modeling of the relationship between Young's modulus and formulation variables for segmented polyurethanes

Abstract: We describe a new modeling approach to prediction of Young's modulus of segmented polyurethanes. This approach combines micromechanical models with thermodynamic considerations based on the theory of block copolymers. The resulting model predicts both the equilibrium morphology and the ''ideal'' Young's modulus of a segmented polyurethane polymer as a function of its formulation (hard segment chemical structure, hard segment weight fraction, soft segment equivalent weight) and temperature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
50
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(94 reference statements)
8
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such domains form due to the thermodynamic incompatibility between hard and soft segments, strong hydrogen bonding interactions between hard segments as well as crystallization of hard segments . Some researchers have tried to explain TPU morphology using classic concepts of the copolymers and predict the system morphological features by estimating Flory–Huggins solubility parameter “ χ,” degree of polymerization, and volume fraction of the hard segment phase in conjunction with the universal phase diagram for copolymers. Despite some successes, this approach leads to oversimplification in other cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such domains form due to the thermodynamic incompatibility between hard and soft segments, strong hydrogen bonding interactions between hard segments as well as crystallization of hard segments . Some researchers have tried to explain TPU morphology using classic concepts of the copolymers and predict the system morphological features by estimating Flory–Huggins solubility parameter “ χ,” degree of polymerization, and volume fraction of the hard segment phase in conjunction with the universal phase diagram for copolymers. Despite some successes, this approach leads to oversimplification in other cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The micro-domain structure varies with the hard segment content and can exhibit a variety of different morphologies, such as sphere, cylinder and lamellar as predicted theoretically. 15 In reality, segmented polyurethanes actually exhibit a very complex morphology arising from polydispersity of the hard and soft blocks and the varying degrees of phase domain purity. The size and purity of the domains control the elastomeric nature and properties of these polymers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with observations of decreasing I 3 and an invariant free volume radius R upon clay loading for semicrystalline poly(m-xylene adipamide)/clay 25 and styrene-butadiene-rubber (SBR)/clay nanocomposites. The order of stiffness for various components of the nanocomposites can be stated as: nanoclay (B270 GPa) 64 > hard segment (B5 GPa) 65 > constrained soft segment > bulk soft segment (B5 MPa). 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%