2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2004.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical perspectives of trade-off analysis using DEA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach eliminates the hassle of running the DEA model for each and every DMU in the sample. Asmild et al (2006) proposed methods for evaluating non-marginal tradeoffs between variables used in a DEA model. These methods are capable of handling scalar as well as additive changes.…”
Section: Dea Model Used For Bankruptcy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach eliminates the hassle of running the DEA model for each and every DMU in the sample. Asmild et al (2006) proposed methods for evaluating non-marginal tradeoffs between variables used in a DEA model. These methods are capable of handling scalar as well as additive changes.…”
Section: Dea Model Used For Bankruptcy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unsuitable to compare an input with an output directly. As mentioned in [37], it is not suitable to compare the importance between the input variables and output variables, for these two kinds of variables are not substitutional, but complementary in DEA models. Therefore, in this step we normalized the non-zero input weights and output weights separately.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the problem of nondifferentiability, Podinovski and Førsund (2010) gave an explicit definition of differential characteristics on a nondifferentiable efficient frontier and proposed a directional-derivative approach to calculate elasticity measures without any simplifying assumptions. They applied differential characteristics to the DEA frontier and addressed elasticity measures and marginal rates of substitution (Asmild et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%