2014
DOI: 10.1111/jace.12764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Predictions on Elastic Stiffness and Intrinsic Thermal Conductivities of Yttrium Silicates

Abstract: Yttrium silicates are promising candidates for environmental and thermal barrier coatings owing to their excellent high-temperature performances. Previous works have experimentally attested to their low thermal conductivity, nevertheless, the experimental data were significantly affected by measurement inaccuracy and the existence of defects such as point defects, dislocations, grain boundaries, and pores in measured samples. In this study, the temperature dependences of intrinsic lattice thermal conductivitie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6, together with the theoretical minimum thermal conductivities and experimental results for comparison. We can see that the thermal conductivity of Lu 4 Si 2 O 7 N 2 follows κ = 852/T (in W m −1 K −1 ) and approaches to the minimum value at temperature about 960 K. When comparing with the experimental ones, it can be seen that the experimental value is higher than the theoretical predicted ones at temperatures over 576 K. Similar phenomena have been noticed and explained in recent work in ␥-Y 2 Si 2 O 7 and Y 2 SiO 5 [45]. It is also shown that theoretical thermal conductivity is higher than its experimental value at lower temperature, and the gap is gradually narrowed until vanished.…”
Section: Theoretical Elastic Propertiessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…6, together with the theoretical minimum thermal conductivities and experimental results for comparison. We can see that the thermal conductivity of Lu 4 Si 2 O 7 N 2 follows κ = 852/T (in W m −1 K −1 ) and approaches to the minimum value at temperature about 960 K. When comparing with the experimental ones, it can be seen that the experimental value is higher than the theoretical predicted ones at temperatures over 576 K. Similar phenomena have been noticed and explained in recent work in ␥-Y 2 Si 2 O 7 and Y 2 SiO 5 [45]. It is also shown that theoretical thermal conductivity is higher than its experimental value at lower temperature, and the gap is gradually narrowed until vanished.…”
Section: Theoretical Elastic Propertiessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This illustrates that in MAX phases, the minimum lattice thermal conductivity should be at relative high temperature close to 2000 K. It also demonstrates the results from Clarke's formula to be close to that predicted by Slack's equation at high temperature despite their different derivations and approximations. We still could not explain such a wide variations in κ min in MAX phases but the data could provide an overall picture of their minimal lattice thermal conductivity with potential implications on possible applications as TBC materials at high temperature [20]. The main conclusion is that generally speaking, MAX carbides have their minimal lattice thermal conductivity larger than the nitrides.…”
Section: Minimum Thermal Conductivity Of Max Phases Using Clarke's Fomentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Hence, θ D calculated from elastic parameters should be the same as those obtained from the specific heat measurements at low temperature. One of the accepted practice is to obtain θ D from average phonon velocity v m by using the following expression [20].…”
Section: Computational Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on Slack model, it is convenient to calculate thermal conductivity from several material parameters that can be deduced by DFT calculation. Recently, Feng, Luo, and Tian successfully combined density functional theory with Slack model to predict the temperature‐dependent lattice thermal conductivities of complex rare‐earth monazite‐type phosphates and silicates.…”
Section: Computational Methods and Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A (γ) [W·mol·kg −1 ·m −2 ·K −3 ] is calculated by:Afalse(normalγfalse)=5.720×107×0.8492[1(0.514/γ)+(0.228/normalγ2)]…”
Section: Computational Methods and Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%