1972
DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(72)90057-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical problems of aversion therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, she reported that the temptation was simply reduced to a level where she was successfully able to resist it. To this extent her experience is consistent with Hallam and Rachman's (1972) observation that "The patients' most common report after aversion therapy is that the deviant stimulus has lost its attraction and interest for them." Hadley (1985) describes this as the "change in valance" theory.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Instead, she reported that the temptation was simply reduced to a level where she was successfully able to resist it. To this extent her experience is consistent with Hallam and Rachman's (1972) observation that "The patients' most common report after aversion therapy is that the deviant stimulus has lost its attraction and interest for them." Hadley (1985) describes this as the "change in valance" theory.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%