1965
DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600540540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Relationship Between Dose, Elimination Rate, and Duration of Pharmacologic Effect of Drugs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been pointed out that a linear relationship may be expected be tween the duration of a pharmacologic effect and the logarithm of an in jected or a relatively rapidly absorbed dose of a drug, provided that (a) the intensity of the effect at a given time is a function of the amount of drug in the body at that time, (b) drug metabolites are inactive or very rapidly eliminated, and (c) the drug is eliminated by apparent first-order kinetics with the rate constant being independent of dose (21,38,39). The slope of the line of a plot of duration of effect versus logarithm of dose is equal to 2.303jk and thereby permits an estimation of the elimination rate constant (k).…”
Section: Single Compartment Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been pointed out that a linear relationship may be expected be tween the duration of a pharmacologic effect and the logarithm of an in jected or a relatively rapidly absorbed dose of a drug, provided that (a) the intensity of the effect at a given time is a function of the amount of drug in the body at that time, (b) drug metabolites are inactive or very rapidly eliminated, and (c) the drug is eliminated by apparent first-order kinetics with the rate constant being independent of dose (21,38,39). The slope of the line of a plot of duration of effect versus logarithm of dose is equal to 2.303jk and thereby permits an estimation of the elimination rate constant (k).…”
Section: Single Compartment Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first-order rate constants for the decay of the response (formal elimination constants; Pliska, 1966) k were determined according to Levy & Nelson (1965) as k = 2-3(íogD-íogd)/(tD-td), where D and d are a larger and a smaller dose of the sample or standard and tD, td are the durations of the respective responses measured as the time from the onset of the response until the return of the conductivity to the base-line value. The ratio of the formal elimination constants for the sample and standard (here LVP), &s/&lvp> is the index of persistence, a dimensionless, dose-independent characteristic of the duration of the effect (Pliska, 1966).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His teachers at SUNY Buffalo, including Dr. Gary Levy and Dr. Milo Gibaldi in pharmacokinetics, Dr. Michael Schwartz in physical pharmacy and Dr. Howard Schaefer in Medicinal Chemistry, introduced him to very modern, at the time, pharmaceutical sciences, including pharmacokinetics, physical pharmacy, and medicinal chemistry. Gordon remembers a course in Pharmacy Calculations (Pharmacy “Math”) and the math symbols and methods of compounding pharmacy, taught by Professor Eino Nelson, an early leader in the science of physical pharmacy, biopharmaceutics, and pharmacokinetics . What surprised him in this course was that Professor Nelson supplemented the course with teaching calculus.…”
Section: The Early Years: Seneca Falls and Buffalo New Yorkmentioning
confidence: 99%