2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41565-019-0486-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical strength and rubber-like behaviour in micro-sized pyrolytic carbon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
92
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
9
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6) and the highest reported value for nanoscale pyrolytic carbon 27 , respectively. Likewise, for the yield strength the applicable bound range is given by the minimum and maximum yield strengths measured from our micro-pillars, 2.2 GPa and 2.7 GPa, respectively, which are in good agreement with literature data on the tensile and compressive strength of nanoscale pyrolytic carbon 28,29 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…6) and the highest reported value for nanoscale pyrolytic carbon 27 , respectively. Likewise, for the yield strength the applicable bound range is given by the minimum and maximum yield strengths measured from our micro-pillars, 2.2 GPa and 2.7 GPa, respectively, which are in good agreement with literature data on the tensile and compressive strength of nanoscale pyrolytic carbon 28,29 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The volume shrinks considerably during the pyrolysis step and is in the order of 90%. According to the PyC preparation method, fracture strength and strain can vary widely, as shown in Figure 20 for two examples from Zhang et al [118] and Albiez et al [119]. Generally, the pillar diameter had an influence on ductility and fracture performance; smaller diameter pillars contained less volume defects, which made them tougher, showing higher fracture strength at high strains.…”
Section: Yield and Fracture Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the pillar diameter had an influence on ductility and fracture performance; smaller diameter pillars contained less volume defects, which made them tougher, showing higher fracture strength at high strains. The PyC pillars from Zhang et al [118] are the most ductile and strong material reported so far, which withstand 40% compressive strain without catastrophic failure (although cracks start to form). Wheeler et al [120] showed that diamond pillars have elastic behavior until catastrophic fracture; however, their fracture strength of 127 GPa and 250 GPa for <100> and <111> orientation, respectively, is not shown on the scale of Figure 20.…”
Section: Yield and Fracture Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the existence of defects and imperfections, the actual strengths of bulk materials are usually several orders of magnitude lower than the theoretical strengths. With advances in nanotechnology, the “smaller is stronger” characteristic has been observed in several classes of materials, such as metals, ceramics, and carbon‐based materials . For brittle materials, the strength for cleavage fracture is given by σnormalf = YKICπanormalc where a c is the minimum characteristic size of defects (e.g., flaws, voids, and cracks), Y is a dimensionless parameter, and K IC is the fracture toughness.…”
Section: Mechanical Behaviors and Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%