2002
DOI: 10.1002/poc.465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical studies on the S—N interaction in sulfinamides

Abstract: The potential energy surface of sulfinamide H(O)S—NH2 (1) was searched, using ab initio and density functional methods, to study the conformational preferences. High‐accuracy G2MP2 calculations showed that the S—N rotational barrier in 1 is 7.0 kcal mol−1. The inversion around N in 1 goes through a very low energy barrier. Charge analysis using the NPA method was performed to elucidate the electronic factors responsible for the observed trends in the S—N interactions. The strength of negative hyperconjugation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental or G 2 (MP 2 )‐calculated HOFs of references are listed in Table . G 2 (MP 2 )‐calculated HOF of NH 3 (−41.28 kJ/mol) is quite close to its experimental value (−45.90 kJ/mol), which well agrees with previous reports that G 2 (MP 2 ) theory can predict HOFs accurately …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental or G 2 (MP 2 )‐calculated HOFs of references are listed in Table . G 2 (MP 2 )‐calculated HOF of NH 3 (−41.28 kJ/mol) is quite close to its experimental value (−45.90 kJ/mol), which well agrees with previous reports that G 2 (MP 2 ) theory can predict HOFs accurately …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…G 2 (MP 2 )-calculated HOF of NH 3 (À41.28 kJ/mol) is quite close to its experimental value (À45.90 kJ/mol), [27] which well agrees with previous reports that G 2 (MP 2 ) theory can predict HOFs accurately. [31][32][33] Table 2 summarizes gas-phase HOFs, solid-phase HOFs and related parameters of these compounds. Obviously, both gasphase and solid-phase HOFs of these compounds are large and positive, which are favor for HEDMs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find only very small electron density changes during rotation, suggesting that the nature of the bond is not affected, Table S1, and thus implying little to no π contributions in this bond. Taken together, our results support previous proposals that rotational barriers are dominated by electron repulsion. We note that S L 2,3 -edge XAS might allow for direct evaluation of d–p π contributions and are currently exploring this avenue.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In this area a great leap forward has been taken since the works of Bharatam who studied the N-S bond rotational barrier, the E : Z isomerization pathway and the charge distribution in sulfinimines using ab initio and DFT methods at the B3LYP/6-31+G* (+ZPE) level. 13,14 Thus, Bharatam demonstrated that sulfinimine 1 exhibits a natural tendency to prefer the conformation C1, wherein the S-O bond and the lone pair of electrons on the nitrogen atom are antiperiplanar (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Structure and Conformation Of Tert-butanesulfiniminesmentioning
confidence: 99%