2014
DOI: 10.1021/jp508183t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Study of Hydrogen Adsorption on Ru-Decorated (8,0) Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube

Abstract: Hydrogen adsorption on Ru-decorated (8,0) zigzag single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) was studied using density functional theory (DFT). Several decoration sites on the CNT surface were investigated before atomic or molecular hydrogen adsorption. The most stable location for a single Ru atom is above the hollow site, with an adsorption energy of E ads (Ru) = −2.133 eV. Ru decoration increases hydrogen adsorption energy nearly 46% compared to pristine CNT. When a hydrogen molecule is considered on Ru/SWCNT its… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
9
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adsorption energy for Pt, Pd, Ni, Cu, Rh, and Ru on SWCNT were calculated to be −2.57, −1.53, −2.02, −0.75, −2.63, and −2.96 eV, respectively, in good agreement with literature data [ 64 , 68 , 74 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 ]. The interactions between the Pt, Pd, Ni, Cu, Rh, and Ru atoms and SWCNT produced a charge transfer of 0.159, 0.125, 0.502, 0.426, 0.312, and 0.376 e from the metals to the nanotube, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The adsorption energy for Pt, Pd, Ni, Cu, Rh, and Ru on SWCNT were calculated to be −2.57, −1.53, −2.02, −0.75, −2.63, and −2.96 eV, respectively, in good agreement with literature data [ 64 , 68 , 74 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 ]. The interactions between the Pt, Pd, Ni, Cu, Rh, and Ru atoms and SWCNT produced a charge transfer of 0.159, 0.125, 0.502, 0.426, 0.312, and 0.376 e from the metals to the nanotube, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The diameter of SWNT (8,0) equals 8a/π = 0.63 nm (a = 0.249 nm = the module of the unit vectors of the graphene lattice) such that it is a reasonable compromise between computation costs and a realistic size. Moreover SWNT (8,0) has been widely studied and the theoretical calculation results can be found in the literature [35][36][37][38][39]. For the optimized geometry of the SWNT (8,0), the PBE0 calculated band gap is 1.55 eV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cutoff energy of 400 eV was selected for geometry optimization. The Γ-centered Monkhorst−Pack scheme of (8,0) CNTs was set at 1 × 1 × 3 k-point mesh, which is consistent with the methods used by Zhou et al 39 and Verdinelli et al 40 The effect of van der Waals (vdW) on the total energy of NCNTs proved to be non-negligible (Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). The DFT-D2 method of Grimme was included for vdW correction to reduce energy deviation.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the computation on CNTs can be carried out with reference to the methods adopted in graphene. In addition, the theoretical research of CNT in other fields, such as CNT catalytic ammonia decomposition, CNT hydrogen storage performance (adsorption of PdH 2 and Pd 2 H 2 ), , and equivalent temperature confinement effect of CNTs also provides a foundation for the research of microlevel electrochemical performance of CNT-based materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%