2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2011.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical study of the influence of Na on CO adsorption and dissociation on Pd(111): Long-range or short-range interactions between co-adsorbates?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The barrier is 3.98 eV and the reaction energy is 2.80 eV in accord with Gan et al on Pd(111). 3 Above all, our calculation results familiarly agree well to those in previous theoretical studies.…”
Section: Comparison With Experiments and Previoussupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The barrier is 3.98 eV and the reaction energy is 2.80 eV in accord with Gan et al on Pd(111). 3 Above all, our calculation results familiarly agree well to those in previous theoretical studies.…”
Section: Comparison With Experiments and Previoussupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similar to other AM/TM cases, i.e., Na/Pd(111), 44 after K adsorption, part of its valence electrons is transferred to the substrate without much modification of the surface band features, suggesting that the donated electrons are rather delocalized. Meanwhile, the valence bands of K were found crossing the Fermi level, indicative of the metallic nature of K adlayer.…”
Section: A K On-surface Adsorptionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The same method of adding electrons to flat surfaces have been used to explore the charge effects on the adsorption and dissociation property of CO on the Pd(111) surface. 60 The comparison results for relative parameters of such given reactions dehydrogenation on pure, K-promoted and negatively polarized Cu(111) and Cu(110) are listed in Table S4. It is found that the same change tendency for the TS structure occurs on Cu 2− (111) and Cu 2− (110) as that on K-added Cu surfaces compared with that on both pure surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To confirm this idea, we have searched the TSs of H 3 CO, H 2 O, and H 3 COH dehydrogenation and calculated the corresponding energy barriers on the negatively charged Cu(111) and Cu(110) surfaces, which are modeled by adding two additional electrons to the neutral Cu surfaces, denoted as Cu 2– (111) and Cu 2– (110). The same method of adding electrons to flat surfaces have been used to explore the charge effects on the adsorption and dissociation property of CO on the Pd(111) surface . The comparison results for relative parameters of such given reactions dehydrogenation on pure, K-promoted and negatively polarized Cu(111) and Cu(110) are listed in Table S4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%