A series of Ir(III) light-emitting
materials, namely Ir(R-dfpypy)2pic (R-dfpypy = 2′,6′-difluoro-4-R-2,3′-bipyridine,
pic = picolinate), where R = −H (1), −CN
(2), −OMe (3), −NMe2 (4), −N(CF3)
2
(5), is evaluated through a comprehensive theoretical
approach in this study. It has been observed in experiments that different
kinds of substituent groups on the dfpypy cyclometalating ligands
brought about considerable photophysical discrepancies. From a theoretical
aspect, these Ir(III) complexes have no obvious differences in the
calculation of radiative decay rates (k
r), which is consistent with experimental results. A convolution method
utilized in computation of the nonradiative decay rate (k
nr) reveals that complex 4 is nonemissive
due to its 1 or 2 orders of magnitude larger k
nr in comparison to the corresponding k
r. Further decomposition of vibration modes that contribute
the most to reorganization energies in low- and high-frequency regions
into internal coordinates indicates that it is the intense oscillation
of bulky substituent groups in complex 4 that leads to
its faster k
nr. On the basis of our corroborated
theoretical approach, the issue of whether the character or the bulk
of the substituent groups influences the quantum efficiency of these
similar Ir(III) light-emitting materials is determined. Therefore,
complex 5, which replaces hydrogen with fluorine atoms
in the substituent groups of complex 4, was investigated
further through vibrational analysis. In comparison with the first
four compounds, complex 5 has a comparable calculated k
r value and has an even larger k
nr than complex 4. Although both compounds 2 and 5 have electron-withdrawing substituent
groups, the chemical properties of substituent groups cannot absolutely
determine the nonradiative decay process. Moreover, the metal-centered
(3MC) triplet excited states and other relative temperature-dependent
nonradiative photodeactivation pathways have also been simulated for
all complexes.