2022
DOI: 10.1002/aoc.6686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical unraveling the complexation and separation of uranyl–ligand complexes towards chiral R/S‐profenofos

Abstract: The identification and separation of chiral pesticides R/S-profenofos are of great significance due to different biological toxicity of chiral isomers. In the study, we designed two novel ligands: (2,2 0 :6 0 ,2 00 -terpyridin)-6-yl(5-methoxy-1H-pyrazol-1-yl) methanethione (TMMT) and (2,2 0 :6 0 ,2 00 -terpyridin)-6-yl(5-methoxy-1H-pyrazol-1-yl) methanone (TMMO), and taking them as ligands coordinated with uranyl, two novel complexes [Uranyl-TMMT] 2+ and [Uranyl-TMMO] 2+ as receptors were successfully construc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5 shows the MOs diagrams 6,11,12 of the six complexes with significant U–X interactions and the contribution (%) of atoms (U, X) to their orbitals 68 . The two diagrams in Figure 5a,b are the MO diagrams of the primary coordination site O 5 of the guest and the receptor (orbital number 79), which has the largest coverage of the isosurfaces compared to the other four MO diagrams, and it is thus clear that the U and O 5 atoms contribute the most to this orbital.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 5 shows the MOs diagrams 6,11,12 of the six complexes with significant U–X interactions and the contribution (%) of atoms (U, X) to their orbitals 68 . The two diagrams in Figure 5a,b are the MO diagrams of the primary coordination site O 5 of the guest and the receptor (orbital number 79), which has the largest coverage of the isosurfaces compared to the other four MO diagrams, and it is thus clear that the U and O 5 atoms contribute the most to this orbital.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the larger ΔE L-H of the molecule itself represents the more difficult it can be excited and the greater stability of the molecular T A B L E 4 Orbital energies of the receptor, guests, and six guest-receptor complexes at the B3LYP/def2-SVP/RECP level (unit: eV). Figure 5 shows the MOs diagrams 6,11,12 of the six complexes with significant U-X interactions and the contribution (%) of atoms (U, X) to their orbitals. 68 The two diagrams in Figure 5a,b are the MO diagrams of the primary coordination site O 5 of the guest and the receptor (orbital number 79), which has the largest coverage of the isosurfaces compared to the other four MO diagrams, and it is thus clear that the U and O 5 atoms contribute the most to this orbital.…”
Section: Mos and Ets-nocv Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This seems to imply that metal-ligand interactions are in the category of ionic bonds and so have negligible pre-relaxation effects. In this study, the Am-ligand, Cm-ligand and Eu-ligand bonds in the studied complexes also have low ρ(r c ) and small delocalization indexes δ (0.14-0.27 a.u., see Table 6) and small H(r c ) and are ionic interactions, similar to the above case of U-ligand bonds and transition metal-ligand bonds, so the prerelaxation effects should be negligible, thus the QTAIM metrics ρ(r c ), δ and H(r c ) may be used to evaluate the strength of the M-ligand bonds [48].…”
Section: Density-based Analyses On Bonding Naturementioning
confidence: 96%
“…[17] Because of the frequent occurrence of mixed chelation in biological fluids, mixed ligand complexes play a significant role in biological and catalytic chemistry. [18][19][20] Mixed ligand complexes synthesis and characterization are becoming more and more important. This inspires the creation of mixed ligand complexes with a range of characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%