Theoretically integrative evaluation practice: A step-by-step overview of an eclectic evaluation design process

Abstract

The evaluation models described in the literature may be interpreted as prescriptive and uniform approaches to practice but, in the real world, practitioners are likely to blend aspects of different models to achieve multiple goals. Despite the commonality of pluralistic approaches in evaluation practice, literature on theoretical integration is sparse. This article guides readers through a theoretically integrative evaluation design process and explicates how different theories informed design decisions. The process integrates program theory–driven and utilization-focused evaluation with evaluability assessment and eclectically draws on principles, methods, and tools from other models. This integrative approach to evaluation aims to increase process use for intended users through shared decision-making, organizational learning, and capacity building while simultaneously producing a robust and relevant evaluation design suited to stakeholder needs and the evaluation context. The authors describe the process utilizing a case example to contribute to the literature on theoretically integrative evaluation practice.

The benefits of participating in a culturally translated youth mentoring program and service‐learning experience for Aotearoa New Zealand mentors

“…A needs analysis and consultation with community stakeholders may underscore additional principles and processes that need to be considered to meet the genuine needs of the local community. Developing a collaborative theory of change with stakeholders can be a useful process in terms of supporting program translation efforts because it can facilitate communication of a shared understanding of the program theory and guide evaluation decisions (Deane, Dutton et al, 2020).…”

Upgrading a Learning Context: Evaluation of Sintra’s Educational Project

“…The evaluation process is itself a learning process. An assessment that integrates a component of collaborative reflection, promotes the production of transformative individual and organizational learning [43]. An assessment that does not generate learning, for all stakeholders, is not an assessment that promotes any change.…”