1971
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0066283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Théorie des Intersections et Théorème de Riemann-Roch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
271
0
17

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 327 publications
(290 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
271
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorems 1-3 have well-known analogs in algebraic K-theory proved by Thomason in [30] based on the work of Waldhausen [31] and Grothendieck et al [4]. In fact, our Theorems 10, 14, 11, 15 and 16-special cases of which are Theorems 2, 3 and 1-are generalizations of the corresponding theorems in Thomason's work.…”
Section: Theorem 3 (Zariski Excision) Let J : U ⊂ X Be Quasi-compact mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Theorems 1-3 have well-known analogs in algebraic K-theory proved by Thomason in [30] based on the work of Waldhausen [31] and Grothendieck et al [4]. In fact, our Theorems 10, 14, 11, 15 and 16-special cases of which are Theorems 2, 3 and 1-are generalizations of the corresponding theorems in Thomason's work.…”
Section: Theorem 3 (Zariski Excision) Let J : U ⊂ X Be Quasi-compact mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The "Leray-Hirsch" in the context of K-theory of complex vector bundles that we need is Theorem 2.7.8, [5]. For part (iv) we use a result of Grothendieck [7] to prove the analogue of Leray-Hirsch theorem. We do not know if parts (iii) and (iv) of the main theorem remain valid without the hypothesis that ( * ) hold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we choose U such that U ∩ supp(T ) ∩ supp(T ) = ∅, the equations Hom (1) (T, T ) = Ext 1 (1) (T, T ) = 0 follow immediately. For Hom (1) …”
Section: Proof If We Associate To a Weil Divisormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) (X) and (1) (X) determines X as an object in Var (1) . At the end of this section we give a short discussion of the case c > 1 and prove the non-existence of a Serre functor on the quotient category if dim(X) ≥ 2.…”
Section: Birational Geometry and D Bmentioning
confidence: 99%