Theorien der Internationalen Politischen Ökonomie

Wullweber, Joscha; Graf, Antonia; Behrens, Maria

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-02527-4_1

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Nun hat die "systemare" und kapitalismustheoretische Herrschaftsanalyse auch in den letzten 30 Jahren in Deutschland eine Rolle gespielt, jedoch nicht im Herzen der IB, sondern im in Deutschland kleinen Feld der Internationalen Politi schen Ökonomie (Schirm 2007;Bieling 2011;Wullweber et al 2013). In der IPÖ, die sich für das Zusammenspiel von Politik und Ökonomie im internationalen Raum interessiert, gibt es neben der Neo-Gramscianischen Debatte, auf die unten genauer eingegangen wird, vielfältige Forschungen zu Rating-Agenturen (Kruck 2014), Steueroasen (Fichtner 2016), dem IWF (Lütz 2014), Finanzmarktregulie rung (Lütz u. Hassel 2010) oder zum Welthandel (Da Conceicao 2010).9…”

Section: Forumunclassified

Mehr Kapitalismus wagen! Herrschaft „jenseits der Anarchie“ und die Rolle des Geldes

Koddenbrock

2017

PVS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An IR open to capitalism? Domination 'beyond anarchy' and the role of money as a global relation Abstract: The forum on domination 'beyond anarchy' has provided a welcome opening for study of inequality, hierarchies and power in contemporary world order for German IR. For practical and normative reasons, however, Daase, Deitellhoff and Ziirn's contributions dispense with the rich scholarly tradition of political economy. By zooming in on global money relations and the creation of money my contribution argues that the study of dom ination in IR requires an understanding of capitalist world society. The evidence is over whelming: Money, credit and debt are at the heart of conflicts for both in the EU and across the globe. In order to be able to deal with this reality IR needs to become IPE, too. An IR open to capitalism will thus include the forces and systemic constraints connected to global money relations and its concomitant inequalities.

show abstract

Section: Forumunclassified

Mehr Kapitalismus wagen! Herrschaft „jenseits der Anarchie“ und die Rolle des Geldes

Koddenbrock

2017

PVS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Theories and approaches to International Political Economy (IPE) are generally divided into three main paradigms: liberalism/neoliberal institutionalism, (neo-mercantilist) realism and Marxism/historical materialism (O'Brien and Williams 2010;Ravenhill 2011;Wullweber et al 2013). Currently, these approaches are sometimes even more condensed into two research traditions: American IPE and British IPE (Cohen 2008).…”

Section: International Political Economymentioning

confidence: 99%

The Global Politics of Science and Technology - Vol. 1

Mayer¹,

Carpes²,

Knoblich³

2014

Global Power Shift

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ample empirical evidence points to recent power shifts in multiple areas of international relations taking place between industrialized countries and emerging powers, and between states and non-state actors. Yet there is a dearth of theoretical interpretation and synthesis of these findings, and a growing need for coherent approaches to understand and measure the transformation. This edited series aims to bring together scholars from all major world regions as well as different disciplines in order to discuss and possibly blend their different approaches and provide new frameworks for the understanding of global affairs and the governance of global power shifts.

show abstract

“…An important debate has developed around ideas advanced by Varieties of Capitalism theory (VoCT) that emphasizes the role of the so-called social systems of production and social institutions as the source of dissimilarities between different types of national economic systems (national capitalisms) and contends that these dissimilarities generate systematic variations in corporate strategy across countries (Hall and Soskice 2001;Hollingsworth and Boyer 1997;Sabel and Zeitlin 1997). VoCT argues that pressures for convergence are counteracted by idiosyncratic national institutional arrangements, complementarily interlinked in a complex whole and persistent over time (Hall 1986;Lane 1995;Chizema and Buck 2006;Wullweber et al 2013).…”

Section: Introduction and Problem Settingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Institutional adjustment and change at the firm level: A varieties of capitalism perspective

Kuznetsov

Jacob

2015

Scandinavian Journal of Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper contributes to a better understanding of global corporate and industrial change at the firm level. Our focus is on convergence vs. divergence of national institutional systems. Data are drawn from a survey of German and UK firms. Our results for adaptation behaviour of British subsidiaries in Germany suggest that at the firm level the primacy of national institutions and institutional complementarity as determinants of the organizational behaviour of MNEs may be overstated.Nonetheless, evidence that German MNEs in Britain seek to choose strategic choices for which there is institutional support in the host country suggests that complementarity is functional enough to incite adjustment even in the absence of strong formal pressure. The evidence that both German and British firms seem to prefer practices characteristic of liberal market economies may pose a problem for institutional stability in Germany and generates implications for the likely pathways of institutional change.

show abstract

Theorien der Internationalen Politischen Ökonomie

Cited by 5 publications

References 32 publications

Mehr Kapitalismus wagen! Herrschaft „jenseits der Anarchie“ und die Rolle des Geldes

Mehr Kapitalismus wagen! Herrschaft „jenseits der Anarchie“ und die Rolle des Geldes

The Global Politics of Science and Technology - Vol. 1

Institutional adjustment and change at the firm level: A varieties of capitalism perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About