1970
DOI: 10.1016/s0074-7742(08)60060-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theories of Biological Etiology of Affective Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 185 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1974], Although other interpretations can be of fered [BrambUia et al. 1978], we arc inclined to believe that in both PAD [Davis. 1970;Schildkraul.…”
Section: Control Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…1974], Although other interpretations can be of fered [BrambUia et al. 1978], we arc inclined to believe that in both PAD [Davis. 1970;Schildkraul.…”
Section: Control Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…It is tempting to suggest that a similar biochemical brain abnormality is present in both conditions, at least with regard to hypothalamic GH regula tion, in 1 case linked to the psychosis and in the other to addiction. In primary affective disorders an impairment in brain monoamine metabolism has been suggested (Davis, 1970;Schildkraut, 1974). The effect of heroin on neutrotransmitters has not been fully clarified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the monoamine theory of affective disorders, the tricyclic antidepressant drugs exert their antidepressant effect by potentiating the pharmacological actions of monoamines at postsynaptic receptor sites in the brain (Schildkraut, 1965;Davis, 1970). It is generally believed that the monoamine potentiating effect of the tricyclic antidepressants is due to their ability to block the uptake of monoamines into monoamine-containing nerve terminals (Iversen, 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%