Theories of Change and Mediators of Psychotherapy Effectiveness in Adolescents With Externalising Behaviours: A Systematic Review

Abstract

BackgroundExternalising behaviours are becoming a remarkably prevalent problem during adolescence, often precipitating both externalising and internalising disorders in later adulthood. Psychological treatments aim to increase the social functioning of adolescents in order for them to live a more balanced life and prevent these negative trajectories. However, little is known of the intervening variables and mediators involved in these treatments' change mechanisms. We conducted a systematic review, exploring the available evidence on mediators of psychological treatments for externalising behaviours and symptoms amongst adolescents (10 to 19 years old).MethodsA systematic search was performed on Medline and PsycINFO databases, which identified studies from inception to February 23, 2020. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials that enrolled adolescents with externalising symptoms and behaviours as, at least, one of the primary outcomes. A group of 20 reviewers from the COST-Action TREATme (CA16102) were divided into 10 pairs. Each pair independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted information from the included studies, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies and the requirements for mediators, following Kazdin's criteria. Risk of bias of RCTs was assessed by the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Extracted data from the included studies were reported using a narrative synthesis.ResultsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA), after removing duplicates, 3,660 articles were screened. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. In a second stage, 965 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 14 studies fulfilled all inclusion criteria. The majority were related to systemic psychological treatment approaches. Two types of mediators were identified as potentially being involved in the mechanisms of change for better social improvements of adolescents: to increase healthier parent–adolescent relationships and parental discipline. However, there were significant and non-significant results amongst the same mediators, which led to discussing the results tentatively.ConclusionsFamily variables were found to be the largest group of investigated mediators, followed by relational, behavioural, and emotional variables. No cognitive or treatment-specific mediators were identified. Both adequate behavioural control of adolescents' peer behaviour and a better positive balance in their relationships with their parents seemed to buffer the effects of externalising behaviours in adolescents. Several methodological limitations concerning mediation testing design, outcome measures, and mediator selection have been identified.Ethics and DisseminationEthical approval was not required. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021231835.

The effectiveness of brief non-pharmacological interventions in emergency departments and psychiatric inpatient units for people in crisis: A systematic review and narrative synthesis

“…Recognising the significance of outcome measures, the development of a shared core outcome set (Mestre Navas et al, 2022) is recommended, defining the minimum best-practice measurement requirements. In the absence of such a set, researchers can turn to resources like the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments) website or engage in collaborative design through methods like Delphi studies (as has been done in Australia (Hill et al, 2019)) or consensus statements (co-produced by stakeholders).…”

“…While most studies mentioned theory of change, it was not always clear whether, or how, the theory of change related to outcome measures. While this is difficult to quantify (Aggarwal et al, 2021; Mestre Navas et al, 2022), as goals and mechanisms of action become clear, outcome measures can be chosen so as to reflect change mechanisms. Ideally, valid and reliable measures should be prioritised over untested outcome measures.…”

“It’s ok that I feel like this”: a qualitative study of adolescents’ and parents’ experiences of facilitators, mechanisms of change and outcomes in a joint emotion regulation group skills training

“…It thus seems that delivering emotion regulation skills training in a joint format has the potential to impact the parent-child relationship. Earlier research has shown that improved family relationships and communication are mechanisms of change in the treatment of adolescent externalising behaviour [ 56 ], and it would be interesting to further investigate the relationship between family functioning and emotion regulation skills.…”

Effectiveness of resilience-based interventions in schools for adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…For example, a systematic review reported that adequate behavioural control of adolescents' peer behaviour and a more positive balance in their relationships with their parents seemed to buffer the effects of mental health problems, increasing their effectiveness. Unfortunately, other mediators, such as emotional, cognitive, and, more importantly, environmental, such as low neighbourhood socioeconomic status, delinquency, exposure to adverse events in the population at risk, or high rates of substance use, are strikingly neglected in the literature (Mestre et al, 2022).…”