Theories of intellectual property: Is it worth the effort?

Wilkof, Neil

doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpu018

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A welldesigned framework is also a precondition for successful market strategies that are proven to be one of the key factors for IP commercialisation (Harrer & Lackner, 2014). While applying intellectual property theories in practice may present some challenges, it is very important to establish and maintain a well-structured framework to regulate it and make commercialisation accessible (Wilkof, 2014)…”

Section: Ip Commercialisation 21 the Importance Of Ip Commercialisationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Commercialisation of Intellectual Property: A Comparative Analysis of Georgia and Estonia

Tkeshelashvili,

Dutt,

Gurgenidze

2024

TalTech Journal of European Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Commercialisation of intellectual property (IP) constitutes a vital part of a state’s economy and signifi cantly contributes to the development and success of any innovative project. At the same time, commercialisation of IP is directly linked to the adopted legislation on patent rights as it regulates the protection and exploitation of IP. This article seeks to compare the IP commercialisation frameworks in Georgia and Estonia and identify the challenges encountered in patent protection mechanisms in Georgia. Estonia and Georgia are both located in the Eastern European region and share similar legal systems and constitutions. By aligning its legislative framework with European Union standards and supporting universities and fostering a culture of innovation, Estonia sets a notable example in IP commercialisation. However, Georgia’s legislative framework still lacks certain elements that are crucial for developing IP commercialisation. The low number of registered patent applications in Georgia indicates the challenges and obstacles in this fi eld. The comparison of legal frameworks and practices in these countries can provide important insights into the challenges and solutions in IP commercialisation. The article examines how inefficient legislative framework leads to inconsistent patent protection mechanisms in Georgia, creating barriers in IP commercialisation, while underlining Estonia’s success in innovation and the establishment of a progressive IP commercialisation landscape. The article also presents a set of recommendations for Georgia to align its framework with EU standards, initiating joining the European Patent Convention, strengthening IP enforcement, and promoting open IP policies in universities, following Estonia’s model.

show abstract

Section: Ip Commercialisation 21 the Importance Of Ip Commercialisationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Commercialisation of Intellectual Property: A Comparative Analysis of Georgia and Estonia

Tkeshelashvili,

Dutt,

Gurgenidze

2024

TalTech Journal of European Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Promoting systemic collaboration for sustainable innovation through intellectual property rights

Siltaloppi

Ballardini

2023

Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Legal policy of the European Union against counterfeiting in the conditions of Digital Single Market

Владимирович¹

2021

Международное Право

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The subject of this research is the legal policy of the European Union against counterfeiting in the conditions of functioning of the Digital Single Market. The goal is to determine the content and patterns of development of this policy from the perspective of combining traditional and innovative measures and initiatives aimed at prevention of trafficking of counterfeit goods in the digital environment. Special attention is given to the analysis of the key factors of formation formation of this policy, taking into account the implementation of the Strategy of the Digital Single Market. The author analyzes the dynamics of application of the organizational-legal mechanisms for combating counterfeiting, and the multi-stakeholder approach that lies beneath them. Separate section of the article is dedicated to establishment of the principles of using voluntary measures on prevention and suppression of the trafficking of counterfeit goods in the digital environment. The conclusion is made that the theoretical provisions indicating that the EU anti-counterfeit policy is aimed the development of supranational block of legal instruments related to the sphere of intellectual property law and customs regulation, and represents a system of comprehensive actions, each of which is implemented depending on the thematic agenda reflecting the strategic intentions for action. The author’s special contribution lies in determination of the patterns of transition towards the regime of responsibility of online platforms that allow posting the offers of counterfeit products. The novelty of this article consists in demonstrating the effective combination of non-legislative and legislative measures used on the supranational level for protecting intellectual property in the conditions of the development of digital environment.

show abstract

Theories of intellectual property: Is it worth the effort?

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Commercialisation of Intellectual Property: A Comparative Analysis of Georgia and Estonia

Commercialisation of Intellectual Property: A Comparative Analysis of Georgia and Estonia

Promoting systemic collaboration for sustainable innovation through intellectual property rights

Legal policy of the European Union against counterfeiting in the conditions of Digital Single Market

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About